Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-12-01 Thread Nathan Angelacos
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 08:07, Erich Titl wrote: Nathan Would you consider to split off haserl and pwcrypt from webconf.lrp. IMHO this would make webconf extremely portable. Erich, My first reaction was but that's what makes it go! Its like removing pluto from ipsec.lrp or pppd from

Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-12-01 Thread Erich Titl
Nathan Nathan Angelacos wrote: On Tuesday 30 November 2004 08:07, Erich Titl wrote: Nathan Would you consider to split off haserl and pwcrypt from webconf.lrp. IMHO this would make webconf extremely portable. Erich, My first reaction was but that's what makes it go! Its like removing

Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-30 Thread Erich Titl
Nathan Nathan Angelacos wrote: On Tuesday 16 November 2004 04:06, Luis.F.Correia wrote: To make webconf a full weblet replacement, there are some things to enhance: - add 'pretty shorewall logs' The version in CVS now has an attempt at parsing the shorewall logs. My initial reaction was

Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-29 Thread Nathan Angelacos
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 04:06, Luis.F.Correia wrote: To make webconf a full weblet replacement, there are some things to enhance: - add 'pretty shorewall logs' The version in CVS now has an attempt at parsing the shorewall logs. My initial reaction was pretty firewall formatting

Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-16 Thread Erich Titl
KP At 00:12 16.11.2004 +0100, K.-P. Kirchdörfer wrote: Hi Erich; maybe I do not understand, maybe you made a typo - but that's what proposes IMHO. I should learn how to read sorry for the noise Erich THINK Püntenstrasse 39 8143 Stallikon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP Fingerprint: BC9A

RE: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-16 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 7:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts Thanks for all the positive feedback on webconf so far.  There

Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-16 Thread Nathan Angelacos
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 04:06, Luis.F.Correia wrote: To make webconf a full weblet replacement, there are some things to enhance: - add 'pretty shorewall logs' You mean the table format (parsefw)? or is there more? - simplify log file viewing by not opening a separate window I was

RE: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-16 Thread Luis.F.Correia
Hi! -Original Message- From: Nathan Angelacos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] - add 'pretty shorewall logs' You mean the table format (parsefw)? or is there more? Yes, it is the parsefw thinghy... - simplify log file viewing by not opening a separate window I was

[leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-15 Thread Nathan Angelacos
Thanks for all the positive feedback on webconf so far.  There is a suggestion that webconf.lrp (core) be just a weblet replacement, and the current expert menu set be moved into webconf.lwp. The reason is situations where an admin wants to give a customer read-only rights to web pages for

Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-15 Thread Erich Titl
Nathan Nathan Angelacos wrote: Thanks for all the positive feedback on webconf so far. There is a suggestion that webconf.lrp (core) be just a weblet replacement, and the current expert menu set be moved into webconf.lwp. The reason is situations where an admin wants to give a customer

Re: [leaf-devel] Suggestion to break up webconf.lrp into lrp and lwp parts

2004-11-15 Thread K.-P. Kirchdörfer
Am Montag, 15. November 2004 23:32 schrieb Erich Titl: Nathan Nathan Angelacos wrote: Thanks for all the positive feedback on webconf so far. There is a suggestion that webconf.lrp (core) be just a weblet replacement, and the current expert menu set be moved into webconf.lwp. The