On Dec 16, 2008, at 9:07 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/cgsic/meetings/48thmeeting/Reports/Timing%20Subcommittee/48-LS%2020080916.pdf
Thanks for posting this - extremely helpful!
On Dec 16, 2008, at 10:47 AM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
Please discontinue use of your
On Dec 16, 2008, at 11:52 AM, Steve Allen wrote:
On Tue 2008-12-16T16:07:30 +, Poul-Henning Kamp hath writ:
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/cgsic/meetings/48thmeeting/Reports/Timing%20Subcommittee/48-LS%2020080916.pdf
That was before the meeting in Geneva, before China objected.
Ah! Thanks
Rob Seaman scripsit:
For instance, I happen to think your notion about perpetually
revolving the time zone offsets around the planet under completely
local authority is spectacularly unworkable.
Why are such changes in timezone unworkable, provided they
don't happen too often? The
On Wed 2008-12-17T19:23:16 -0700, Rob Seaman hath writ:
The historical trend
(http://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/ancient.png ) won't just vanish with
the actions of the ITU, it will pop up again somewhere else.
I appreciate the link to the LOD plot, and I have faith in the
readership of
