On 2019-01-20 17:19, Steve Allen wrote:
Those pages are a response to Recommendation 2 from the second CCDS
meeting held 1961-04-11/1961-04-12. At the CCDS meeting BIH presented
an initial effort to integrate and compare all the cesium standards
for which data were available, and BIH was
On Sun 2019-01-20T06:22:58-0800 Tom Van Baak hath writ:
> I'm curious how your findings compare with this random link I ran across [1]:
>
> https://koka-lang.github.io/koka/doc/std_time_utc.html
>
> See especially section "1.3. UTC before 1961"
It was 1959 July or August (recollections differ)
On Sun 2019-01-20T15:15:54+ Michael Deckers hath writ:
> On 2019-01-20 00:50, Steve Allen wrote:
> > I took a closer read and cross reference of the relevant
> > issues of Bulletin Horaire and finalized my web page.
> > The epoch at which TAI was set is definitely 1961-01-01T20:00:00 UT2
>
>
On 2019-01-20 00:50, Steve Allen wrote:
I took a closer read and cross reference of the relevant
issues of Bulletin Horaire and finalized my web page.
The epoch at which TAI was set is definitely 1961-01-01T20:00:00 UT2
Arias and Guinot say in "Coordinated Universal Time UTC:
> The epoch at which TAI was set is definitely 1961-01-01T20:00:00 UT2
>
> https://www.ucolick.org/~sla/leapsecs/taiepoch.html
I'm curious how your findings compare with this random link I ran across [1]:
https://koka-lang.github.io/koka/doc/std_time_utc.html
See especially section "1.3. UTC
