On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 5:24 PM jimlux wrote:
> On 11/12/20 3:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> >
> >
> >> predicts that d(UT2)/d(TAI) = 1 after 2021-11-13, ie
> >> the rates of UTT2 and TAI are expected to agree for the
> >> next year. This has never happened since 1961.
On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 4:46 PM Poul-Henning Kamp
wrote:
>
>
> > predicts that d(UT2)/d(TAI) = 1 after 2021-11-13, ie
> > the rates of UTT2 and TAI are expected to agree for the
> > next year. This has never happened since 1961. We may
> > not need to abolish leap
On Thu, 12 Nov 2020 23:45:52 +, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
>
>
>> predicts that d(UT2)/d(TAI) = 1 after 2021-11-13, ie
>> the rates of UTT2 and TAI are expected to agree for the
>> next year. This has never happened since 1961. We may
>> not need to abolish leap seconds
On 11/12/20 3:45 PM, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
predicts that d(UT2)/d(TAI) = 1 after 2021-11-13, ie
the rates of UTT2 and TAI are expected to agree for the
next year. This has never happened since 1961. We may
not need to abolish leap seconds for quite a while.
> predicts that d(UT2)/d(TAI) = 1 after 2021-11-13, ie
> the rates of UTT2 and TAI are expected to agree for the
> next year. This has never happened since 1961. We may
> not need to abolish leap seconds for quite a while.
Unless of course we get close enough to a
The latest Bulletin A
[https://datacenter.iers.org/data/latestVersion/6_BULLETIN_A_V2013_016.txt]
predicts that d(UT2)/d(TAI) = 1 after 2021-11-13, ie
the rates of UTT2 and TAI are expected to agree for the
next year. This has never happened since 1961. We may
not need to
