Re: [LEAPSECS] [ntpwg] Further to the timestamping issue

2008-06-19 Thread Rob Seaman
This discussion should go to LEAPSECS and leave NTPWG. I'm copying it over there. Please remove ntpwg from further replies. POSIX specs for zoneinfo already require enough complexity to handle the leap seconds, and the mechanisms for updating the zoneinfo files are well tested. All

Re: [LEAPSECS] [ntpwg] Further to the timestamping issue

2008-06-19 Thread Rob Seaman
Replies to leapsecs. On Jun 19, 2008, at 1:33 PM, Marshall Eubanks wrote: Leapseconds are driven by torques at the core mantle boundary, which we cannot see directly and basically have information about only through UT1 and LOD measurements. In practice, leap seconds cannot be predicted