>> 2 (or more) Loran-C stations gave you more accurate time. But if you
>> know where you are, and since the stations don't move, you can
>> manually adjust for signal propagation delay to some extent. This is
>> not unlike how one obtains time from WWV or WWVB.
>
> One of the big issues with
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 12:36 PM Tom Van Baak wrote:
> > I thought of Loran... but you need 2 stations for time, I thought...
>
> 2 (or more) Loran-C stations gave you more accurate time. But if you know
> where you are, and since the stations don't move, you can manually adjust
> for signal
> Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce
shall
> make available a GNSS-independent source of Coordinated Universal Time,
> to support the needs of critical infrastructure owners and operators,
> for the public and private sectors to access.
And I hope by "source of
> I thought of Loran... but you need 2 stations for time, I thought...
2 (or more) Loran-C stations gave you more accurate time. But if you
know where you are, and since the stations don't move, you can manually
adjust for signal propagation delay to some extent. This is not unlike
how one
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020, 11:13 AM Steve Allen wrote:
> On Thu 2020-02-13T14:37:32+ Richard Langley hath writ:
> > https://www.gpsworld.com/gps-backup-demonstration-projects-explained/
>
> Crossing over a thread from time-nuts, the Wildwood eLoran should turn
> on its transmitter some time this
On Thu 2020-02-13T14:37:32+ Richard Langley hath writ:
> https://www.gpsworld.com/gps-backup-demonstration-projects-explained/
Crossing over a thread from time-nuts, the Wildwood eLoran should turn
on its transmitter some time this week.
--
Steve Allen WGS-84
On 2/13/20 6:47 AM, Seaman, Robert Lewis - (rseaman) wrote:
Conceivably Ruth Belville might satisfy the language:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Belville#/media/File:Ruth_Belville_1908.jpg
Assuming Ms. Belville (or her successors) set their watches
appropriately, yes. And it would be a
> On Feb 13, 2020, at 9:14 AM, Seaman, Robert Lewis - (rseaman)
> wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Interesting! A few immediate comments / questions:
>
> 1) Political talk to /dev/null
> 2) Whether as executive order or otherwise, language like this obviously
> originated with experts.
> 3) Does
Conceivably Ruth Belville might satisfy the language:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ruth_Belville#/media/File:Ruth_Belville_1908.jpg
--
On 2/13/20, 7:37 AM, "LEAPSECS on behalf of Richard Langley"
wrote:
Yes, I don't think Mr. Trump came up with the language or even read it. ;-)
Not
Yes, I don't think Mr. Trump came up with the language or even read it. ;-) Not
sure where Canada stands on the subject at the moment (I'll enquire), but the
U.S. effort might be driven by DoT through its Positioning, Navigation, and
Timing (PNT) & Spectrum Management division under the
On 2/13/20 5:46 AM, Richard Langley wrote:
"(i) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce shall
make available a GNSS-independent source of Coordinated Universal Time, to support the
needs of critical infrastructure owners and operators, for the public and private
Hi Richard,
Interesting! A few immediate comments / questions:
1) Political talk to /dev/null
2) Whether as executive order or otherwise, language like this obviously
originated with experts.
3) Does anybody know what agenc(ies) appears to be motivating this?
4) Are commercial interests
"(i) Within 180 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Commerce
shall make available a GNSS-independent source of Coordinated Universal Time,
to support the needs of critical infrastructure owners and operators, for the
public and private sectors to access."
13 matches
Mail list logo
