Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread Steve Allen
On Thu 2006-01-05T08:18:11 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp hath echoed Rob: Which is why the longitude conference decided on a 1 hour quantum. No, they did not. The delegates gratuitously offered existing schemes (the US railroads being one touted long and hard by some guy named Allen) along with

Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread Ed Davies
Rob Seaman wrote: I said: all parties must certainly agree that civil time (as we know it) IS mean solar time. Ed says: saying that it IS civil time is probably a bit strong. Probably a bit strong is not precisely a staunch denial. It's not meant to be a staunch denial. I'm mostly

Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread Clive D.W. Feather
Rob Seaman said: Rather, the often repeated canard that civilians don't give a fig for the actual position of the sun in the sky implies that it is precisely apparent solar time that only queer ducks like astronomers care about. Mean solar time is what civilians DO care about. Only *very*

Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-05 Thread William Thompson
Clive D.W. Feather wrote: Rob Seaman said: Rather, the often repeated canard that civilians don't give a fig for the actual position of the sun in the sky implies that it is precisely apparent solar time that only queer ducks like astronomers care about. Mean solar time is what civilians DO

Re: civil time = solar time

2006-01-04 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Rob Seaman writes: I said: all parties must certainly agree that civil time (as we know it) IS mean solar time. Ed says: saying that it IS civil time is probably a bit strong. Probably a bit strong is not precisely a staunch denial. [...] This is simply a