Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-29 Thread Ken Pizzini
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:33:48AM -0800, Steve Allen wrote: What for? Why should we (the people of the Earth) care about mean solar days? For some purposes, apparent solar time is important, but most of the time it's civil time that counts. Why should that be tied to mean solar days?

Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-29 Thread John Cowan
Steve Allen scripsit: Which is more important... for civil time to be counted in SI seconds? for civil time to track the rotation of earth smoothly? IMHO the former. Mark's alternative resembles the civil time solution adopted by the martian colonists in Kim Stanley

Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-28 Thread Dr. Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2003/01/27 18:21:02 -, Ed Davies wrote in a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Everything would be a lot simpler and more reliable if all systems could work with a single simple universal time scale which: 1. Has SI length seconds. 2. Has minutes of 60 seconds, hours of 3'600 seconds and

Re: Leap-seconds, the epsilon perspective

2003-01-28 Thread John Cowan
Dr. Mark Calabretta scripsit: Much of the problem boils down to the question of why we would want to continue to pretend that a mean solar day has exactly 86400 SI seconds when in fact, it has 86400+epsilon SI seconds. I at least care that a *civil* day be 86400 SI seconds in length. Mean