Re: Wikipedia article

2007-01-03 Thread Zefram
Brian Garrett wrote: Besides, the English term leap second is a misnomer--a leap year is a year with an extra day in it (and the inserted day is *not* called a leap day) Actually it *is* called a leap day. It is the leap year terminology that is the odd one out. -zefram

Re: Wikipedia article

2007-01-02 Thread Zefram
Ed Davies wrote: However, it's a horrible article and really needs reorganization as some of the paragraphs have suffered serious mission creep. I edited quite a lot of time-related articles last year, and couldn't figure out what to do with it. I started off with the articles on astronomical

Re: Wikipedia article

2007-01-02 Thread Brian Garrett
- Original Message - From: Ed Davies [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LEAPSECS@ROM.USNO.NAVY.MIL Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2007 3:55 PM Subject: [LEAPSECS] Wikipedia article Thanks to those who confirmed the ITU text on when leap seconds can be applied. I've made two small edits