From: Steve Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?
Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2006 20:45:58 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This history is apparently not lost to folks at NIST, for the US
senate continues to consider legislation which would explicitly
rewrite US
From: Peter Bunclark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] what time is it, legally?
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:05:00 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob,
On Wed, 13 Dec 2006, Ed Davies wrote:
Rob Seaman wrote:
I'm given to wonder how much of the friction on this mailing list is
From: Poul-Henning Kamp [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term scheduling
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 19:29:19 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Poul-Henning,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Allen writes:
McCarthy pretty much answered this question in 2001 as I
From: Michael Sokolov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces
Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2007 22:22:23 GMT
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd like to see an elastic civil second to which SI nanoseconds are
added or removed.
Ditto! I have
From: Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 15:21:14 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ashley,
Magnus Danielson wrote:
The detailed introduction of the frequency
corrections in various sources was different, and getting
From: Ashley Yakeley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 16:40:23 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ashley,
Magnus Danielson wrote:
The budget isn't there and the govrements already pay
good money for the systems in place and is looking
From: Rob Seaman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 20:45:14 -0700
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rob,
Magnus Danielson wrote:
If you do want a new timescale, I think rubber seconds isn't going
to be the solution.
One might point out
From: Steve Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] A lurker surfaces
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2007 21:35:24 -0800
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue 2007-01-02T22:16:19 -0700, M. Warner Losh hath writ:
changed in later revisions to be the same as GPS time. There's an
extreme reluctance
From: Tony Finch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LEAPSECS] Introduction of long term scheduling
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2007 17:38:35 +
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 3 Jan 2007, Magnus Danielson wrote:
Assuming you have corrected for another gravitational field, yes. The
current SI
