[Ledger-smb-devel] Plan for refactoring user information

2007-03-05 Thread Chris Travers
data from non-modifiable data, and would help to normalize the structure to a large extent. Any feedback? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Plan for refactoring user information

2007-03-05 Thread Chris Travers
Travers On 3/5/07, Ashley J Gittins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Chris Travers wrote: > > Hi all; > > > > I am looking at reactoring user information in 1.3. Here is my basic > > proposal: > > > > 1) Users are connected to three ot

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.2.0RC1 Build test fails

2007-03-06 Thread Chris Travers
successfully. This will be corrected in rc3 (scheduled for release tonight). Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/6/07, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I downloaded ledger-smb-1.2.0rc1.tar.gz, unpacked it, installed the > dependencies from the Debian archive (Unstable), ran &#

[Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed conventions for plpgsql coding for 1.3 and beyond

2007-03-06 Thread Chris Travers
hould be prefixed with in_ to ensure uniqueness from the column names. Functions which save entities should return the primary key of the saved entity. Any feedback? Best WIshes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Infl

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed conventions for plpgsql coding for 1.3 and beyond

2007-03-06 Thread Chris Travers
ents would have to have more intelligence about the variables supplied as arguments). At any rate, I am not opposed to allowing for PL/Perl contributions, but I would want to see how it is to set up on Windows via Vanilla Perl. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/6/07, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Checklist for 1.3

2007-03-08 Thread Chris Travers
erent development environments. 2) One could add XSLT or CSS stylesheets for web browsers and allow people to generate reports based directly on browsing the resources. Such reports could be bookmarked. Best Wishes, Chris Tr

[Ledger-smb-devel] Refactoring code for 1.3

2007-03-09 Thread Chris Travers
dittrail(move to DBObject/stored procedure, or maybe even triggers. Unsure split-date Any thoughts or feedback? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Te

[Ledger-smb-devel] Audit trails in 1.3/1.4

2007-03-09 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; I am going to suggest we move audit trails into triggers by 1.4. This would provide a simple way of ensuring that audit trails are kept. And I would suggest we have them enabled by default at that point as well. Any thoughts? Best Wishes, Chris Travers

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts for 1.3

2007-03-10 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; Unfortunately, invoices are dependant on a lot of things. Our current plan is basically as follows: 1) Develop a new architecture and move a few easy and critical areas over to it in 1.3 (employees, users, security, and customers/vendors). This gives us a chance to take a close look at

[Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed (and tentative) roadmap

2007-03-10 Thread Chris Travers
feedback? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through bri

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] 1.2.0RC3

2007-03-10 Thread Chris Travers
Oops. Fixed now. Many thanks; Chris Travers On 3/10/07, John Hasler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > <http://www.ledgersmb.org/> says that 1.2.0RC3 has been released but the > download link takes me to 1.2.0RC1. > -- > John Hasler > [EMAIL P

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed (and tentative) roadmap

2007-03-11 Thread Chris Travers
I have been planning a payroll module, but there is always room for more help :-). I will post my ideas here. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/11/07, John Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, Chris, > > All sounds good. Particularly looking forward in the near future to > u

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Tracking Customers

2007-03-13 Thread Chris Travers
r example, it is entirely possible for one individual at a company to have three telephone numbers, two mailing addresses, three email addresses, and so forth. So I suppose we should probably break this into contacts, addresses, phone_numbers, addresses, email_addresses. I suppose that once we go

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] sub parse_incriment

2007-03-13 Thread Chris Travers
Ok. Fixing. On 3/13/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > do we mean parse_increment? > -- > > === The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. === > Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240 > Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Doc in tex...

2007-03-14 Thread Chris Travers
I guess those are the immediate questions: 1) Who wants to take on the docuentation editor role? 2) What formats will we accept documentation edits in? Do we want to force bookkeepers and accountants to learn DocBook, or are HTML

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Tracking Customers

2007-03-14 Thread Chris Travers
allow multiple addresses, phone numbers, email addresses, etc. per contact from the workflow provided. Of course that might just be a default, and it might not be too hard to add that in for customers who really needed it. But the number of round-trips might get annoying ;-) Best Wishes

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed (and tentative) roadmap

2007-03-14 Thread Chris Travers
On 3/14/07, David Tangye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-03-11 at 21:38 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > I have been planning a payroll module, but there is always room for > > more help :-). I will post my ideas here. > > Hi Chris. Your forward plan looked

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] AJA(*) data formats

2007-03-14 Thread Chris Travers
document which will be XBRL compliant where appropriate. However, it should be reasonably easy to convert this to YAML and the like via XSLT. I think it would be reasonale to add these scripts either into an add-on repository or core depending on what people want. Best Wishes, Chris Travers >

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Doc in tex...

2007-03-14 Thread Chris Travers
rendition would allow people who don't want to have to learn a format to contribute. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/14/07, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Also one question that was brought up before and never real

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Tracking Customers

2007-03-14 Thread Chris Travers
can get an Ajax implementation in place, workflow is not likely to be easily optimized for the click and wait model. Having a good framework which *can* do this but may be simple by default may be a good step forward. Note that we are working on making this much easier to customize on the UI side. Bes

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Tracking Customers

2007-03-14 Thread Chris Travers
. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/14/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Understood and agreed. I like Josh's approach very much. > > All that said, please know that I do understand that there are higher > priorities than this (namely, making the accounting s

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Doc in tex...

2007-03-15 Thread Chris Travers
as well. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/15/07, Michael Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Travers wrote: > > So I guess those are the immediate questions: > > > > 1) Who wants to take on the docuentation editor role? > > I'd be happy to take

[Ledger-smb-devel] And feedback on designing an online help system?

2007-03-15 Thread Chris Travers
est Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief su

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] And feedback on designing an online help system?

2007-03-15 Thread Chris Travers
Part of what I am trying to build is a usage model. How would you want to use it? Have long descriptions of error messages including common causes? Have descriptions pop up over buttons? What would you find useful? Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/15/07, Darald Bantel <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] New drupal site

2007-03-18 Thread Chris Travers
Personally I like the new layout and a lot of the new work. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to

[Ledger-smb-devel] Idea for New LaTeX formats. Comments?

2007-03-18 Thread Chris Travers
, and large portions of them could be standardized across all of the documents that a company uses. Any ideas, comments, requirements, feedback? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Idea for New LaTeX formats. Comments?

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Travers
documents. But that doesn't mean others can't use other things. Interestingly, although CSS has specifications for paged media, these do not seem to be well supported on browsers. As time goes on, however, it may be a viable option as well. Best Wishes, Chris Travers --

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Idea for New LaTeX formats. Comments?

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Travers
On 3/19/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Darrick Hartman wrote: > > Chris Travers wrote: > >> Interestingly, although CSS has specifications for paged media, these > >> do not seem to be well supported on browsers. As time goes on, > >>

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Idea for New LaTeX formats. Comments?

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Travers
probably be the preferred higher-end solution. Just my $0.02. Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Idea for New LaTeX formats. Comments?

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Travers
"Higher-end" meaning that other solutions would be available to fill a more mass-marked requirement for those who want them, Best Wishes Chris Travers On 3/19/07, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Note that the last comment was somewhat in just. > > Actually,

[Ledger-smb-devel] Users of 1.2.0 from SVN: Back-up your ledger-smb.conf

2007-03-19 Thread Chris Travers
Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and

[Ledger-smb-devel] Notice: Lists will be moved from Sourceforge

2007-03-23 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; As discussed some time ago, we have decided to move the mailing lists off Sourceforge and to the same servers as host our web sites. These lists will be moved shortly. If anyone has any concerns, please feel free to contact me on or off list. Best Wishes, Chris Travers

[Ledger-smb-devel] Opening discussion on user interface guidelines

2007-03-23 Thread Chris Travers
Any further ideas, feedback, thoughts? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT &a

[Ledger-smb-devel] Where we are going with 1.3

2007-03-25 Thread Chris Travers
that will require more extensive testing Any other thoughts or concerns? What do people think about this direction in general? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Where we are going with 1.3

2007-03-25 Thread Chris Travers
On 3/25/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Travers wrote: > > Hi all; > > > > I thought it might be a good time to update everyone with the progress > > in svn /trunk, which will eventually be released 1.3. There are a lot > > of exciting d

[Ledger-smb-devel] Date Entry widget for 1.3

2007-03-25 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; I think that it is time that we address the question of what sort of date entry widget to use for new UI code in 1.3 (it is too soon to know if all code will be able to support this in 1.3). Are there nominees for a date widget? Best Wishes, Chris Travers

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposing workflow

2007-03-27 Thread Chris Travers
Longer-run I am thinking that a portal of configurable widgets would be best. But for now, anything is an improvement over what we have at the moment. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 3/27/07, Jason Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Friday 23 March 2007 11:58, Joshua D. Dr

[Ledger-smb-devel] Performance observations about 1.2 and thoughts on the future

2007-03-29 Thread Chris Travers
memory on the web server. It would not be appropriate for all installations immediately. Is there anything else I have missed? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join

[Ledger-smb-devel] SQL-Ledger License Change (?)

2007-03-30 Thread Chris Travers
t we avoid using any DWS code in our system. Although all new code should be using the new architecture, I wanted to give the heads up that this might now be a legal as well as a technical issue. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Ta

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-core] Support and Devel Targets

2007-04-02 Thread Chris Travers
, Chris Travers On 4/2/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > Chris and I were talking tonight and we came up with the brilliant idea > of documenting our supported versions of PostgreSQL. We wanted to see > what the community thinks so here ya go: > >

[Ledger-smb-devel] Is everyone ready to tag and release 1.2.0?

2007-04-02 Thread Chris Travers
Please let me know if there are any blocking issues still. Best Wishes. Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] What are we missing to move wiki to www

2007-04-05 Thread Chris Travers
added our team public GPG key to a link on the download page. Access to this key is necessary for verifying package signatures. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/5/07, Ashley J Gittins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 3 Apr 2007, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > I would like to push

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ledger-smb vs. ledgersmb

2007-04-05 Thread Chris Travers
entirely. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/5/07, Joshua D. Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael Schultheiss wrote: > > I noticed 1.2.0 was released as ledgersmb rather than ledger-smb like > > past revisions. Is ledgersmb now the preferred name? &

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Template storage mechanism?

2007-04-07 Thread Chris Travers
Just a couple of points: I don't think you can do any real validadation of TeX. That might be possible in other areas, but since TeX will almost certainly act as the high-end template system, we have to acknowledge that some level of validation is going to break down at some point. On 4/7/07, As

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Template storage mechanism?

2007-04-07 Thread Chris Travers
(and the input before it is rendered) is likely to be the easiest and most robust way to prevent arbitrary malicious users from breaking into the application. But I am open to other suggestions. Best Wishes, Chris Travers -

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Where we are going with 1.3

2007-04-07 Thread Chris Travers
prevent the product from being a real Quickbooks replacement if we make too many of these that inconvenient). Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Tech

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Template storage mechanism?

2007-04-07 Thread Chris Travers
ecially since the security is likely to be largely enforced by the RDBMS. > > > > I am more worried about being able to exploit loadable templates in > > this way. > > I don't understand what is exploitable about a template..(?) Sorry. Any time you have th

[Ledger-smb-devel] 1.2.1 released

2007-04-09 Thread Chris Travers
e somewhat tricky. We expect that 1.2.0 will probably be the roughest transition because as we go forward, the code will be more condusive to automatic testing and more test cases will be built. 1.2.1 is now the latest stable release and the current recommended version. Best Wishes, Chr

[Ledger-smb-devel] Action Required: 1.2.x releases withdrawn

2007-04-09 Thread Chris Travers
, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and

[Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB 1.2.2 released

2007-04-10 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; What has been fixed (since 1.2.0): 1) Backups created from the user interface were sending out blank backups. 2) Sales tax was selecting the wrong acounts for invoices and printing. 3) Data entry screens were showing incorrect amounts for sales tax. 4) Logos were not printing. 5) Data

[Ledger-smb-devel] New bug found in LedgerSMB. Fix available, action recommended

2007-04-12 Thread Chris Travers
, we can provide guidance, free of charge, for identifying any possible issues, and providing possible solutions. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT Join SourceForge.net's Te

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Where we are going with 1.3

2007-04-12 Thread Chris Travers
A few areas like sales tax calculation are defined in Perl. Our Perl modules already have some really cool features in this area. V = data import/export (including data entry), and support constructs. V includes web services. C = control logic. This is all in

[Ledger-smb-devel] New email list announcement

2007-04-13 Thread Chris Travers
the Ubuntu code of conduct will be upheld. The Ubuntu code of contact can be found at http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/. Please join us at: http://lists.ledgersmb.org/mailman/listinfo/sql-ledger-help Best Wishes, Chris Travers Note: SQL-Ledger is a registered trademark of DWS Systems

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Please help us get slashdotted - take 2

2007-04-14 Thread Chris Travers
ting them know. I have been doing the same to SQL-Ledger contributors with a similar result. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express a

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] New email list announcement

2007-04-14 Thread Chris Travers
cussion on our web site as to why we are economically viable. I don't think we need to reference his project on the site. It is probably a good idea to get our point across. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Default dates again - ex Re: Templates storage

2007-04-14 Thread Chris Travers
The idea of a single global setting for date entry is not a bad one. Feel free to submit a feature request. On 4/14/07, David Tangye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2007-04-13 at 13:11 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: > > In short: > > > > Programmers will want the templates on disk. This makes

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] New email list announcement

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Travers
es. We are, after all, only human. Having said this, I believe very strongly in the project taking the moral high ground. > Like I said, I switched to the LSMB community because I feel the > standards of behavior and ethics i

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Travers
problem occur, there is an obvious point of contact and there is no confusion as to what is going on or who to contact. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/14/07, Chris Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I've been lurking for a while watching LSMB develop, very pleased with >

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-announce] LedgerSMB 1.2.3 released

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Travers
No. New company datasets are safe. On 4/15/07, David Tangye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 18:28 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > If you have a new database (not an upgrade) and you want to bill for > > fractional quantities (say, 0.25), run the foll

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-announce] LedgerSMB 1.2.3 released

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Travers
New datasets created in 1.2.3 are safe. Those created in 1.2.0-1.2.2 are a problem On 4/15/07, David Tangye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry, now I am confused. The statements below seem contradictory. > > On Sun, 2007-04-15 at 18:52 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > No.

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Site for LedgerSMB Forum

2007-04-15 Thread Chris Travers
ail harvest prevention addressed in it. > If yes, how? I have no idea, That is part of the problem. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the F

[Ledger-smb-devel] Hotfix available: Vendor invoice integer errors with fractional quantities

2007-04-17 Thread Chris Travers
ate to the latest svn in branches/1.2 or email me specifically for the patch. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control o

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger SMB

2007-04-19 Thread Chris Travers
d changes to this architecture? If so, why? The architecture is going to change radically, but we will still use PostgreSQL and have no plans to change from Perl. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsor

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Yet another Disturbing type of Exploit

2007-04-19 Thread Chris Travers
application to run arbitrary code in other peoples' web browsers. This looks like a subtype fo XSS attacks and we take these seriously. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/19/07, Chris Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://www.ngssoftware.com/research/papers/InterProtocolEx

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Ledger SMB

2007-04-19 Thread Chris Travers
sic RESTful web interface which should make this far easier. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML.

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Yet another Disturbing type of Exploit

2007-04-19 Thread Chris Travers
we need to support a device with spotty Javascript support (like a handheld device running Pocket IE). Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/19/07, Jason Rodrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thursday 19 April 2007 13:05, Chris Travers wrote: > > > Obviously LSMB would not be sus

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Patch for UPGRADE file

2007-04-22 Thread Chris Travers
Hi David; Sorry for the delay. I have reviewed your patch and am about to commit it. If you have any special instructions for the mention in the CONTRIBUTORS file, please let me know off-list. Normally we include name, email and a description of contributions. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LaTeX - some logos print, others don't.

2007-04-22 Thread Chris Travers
llows: Instead of: \includegraphics[height=1cm]{logo-colour} use: \includegraphics[height=1cm]{/path/to/logo-colour} I.e. use the absolute path. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/22/07, Stroller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ok, > > I've condensed the description of my proble

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Patch for UPGRADE file

2007-04-22 Thread Chris Travers
m second system syndrome (all the optional conditions, etc). The latest one does not allow any optional conditions (including the pernicious network-access-to-source clause) and only provides a linking exception to the Affero Public License (the reason that clause had been in there). Even Li

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Patches for xhtml code

2007-04-24 Thread Chris Travers
I will be looking at this shortly. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/24/07, David Bandel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris & crew, > > Just a couple of _very_ small patches to start out, but they make the > difference between valid xhtml code and invalid code. Impact shou

[Ledger-smb-devel] proposing Section 508 compliance as requirement for 2.x

2007-04-24 Thread Chris Travers
? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] proposing Section 508 compliance as requirement for 2.x

2007-04-24 Thread Chris Travers
There are, I am sure, places where tables will be appropriate (reports being a good example). I can even imagine getting the invoice lineitems into a single table. But tables should be used on tabular data only :-) Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/24/07, Jeff Kowalczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] proposing Section 508 compliance as requirement for 2.x

2007-04-25 Thread Chris Travers
ctually think it will be too bad as long as we start now. Of course, you don't have to worry so much about it for the stuff not moved into templates since that is going away. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net e

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] proposing Section 508 compliance as requirement for 2.x

2007-04-26 Thread Chris Travers
the state... and you don't tend to store state on > the server... some sort of hybrid may be more appropriate, especially if > we do more of a transaction model for certain things... I have some ideas about preventing duplicate submissions bu

[Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-26 Thread Chris Travers
? I would think the answer would be yes, and then have a table which handles the many-many relationship between payment entries and other entries. What do other people think? Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-26 Thread Chris Travers
The other thing this would allow would be for a general journal report (a description of every transaction in chronological order of entry) with payments appearing in the proper places. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 4/26/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Chris Travers wrot

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-26 Thread Chris Travers
l-transaction items (order entry, quotations, warehouses, pricematrix, contact management, etc) fall outside this. In essence the general journal does exactly what it does in the paper accounting world-- acts as the first point of entry for any finan

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-26 Thread Chris Travers
-) Best Wishes. Chris Travers On 4/26/07, David Tangye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 19:36 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > On 4/26/07, Gerald Chudyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Are you planning total integration between accounting

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-26 Thread Chris Travers
your work flow. Long-run I want to see workflows mapped so that altering a financial transaction that has been posted is *never* done. We can provide a nice UI for reversing and correcting invoices but it will be done only with inserts, not updates :-) And the reversals would show up on GL

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-27 Thread Chris Travers
may not be practical, however. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get i

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-27 Thread Chris Travers
s orders and quotes are not. In particular, when you convert an order to an invoice it becomes a financial transaction. Having said this, they are still phases of the document and might get stored in the same table (though an order would not reference any Journal entries).

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-27 Thread Chris Travers
s are financial transactions while orders are not. Again, information-wise they can still be part of the same physical layout, but the order will not have the financial component. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net ema

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Redeveloping the system - was Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-27 Thread Chris Travers
documents and entries. Some business rules may exist here. 3) Workflow/User Experience concept: Here we have screens and workflows. Some business rules may exist here. > > > On Fri, 2007-04-27 at 08:18 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > > > > > Invoices are accountin

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-28 Thread Chris Travers
refunds), returned for RMA repairs, etc... > > Any thoughts? Ideally, when you post an invoice, any prepayments should be detected and the appropriate unearned income accounts should be handled appropriately. This cannot be done at the moment, but I think we should look at doing it. Best Wishe

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Redeveloping the system - was Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-28 Thread Chris Travers
nclude two categories: 1) Tutorials (example cases of how to use the software as it is). 2) Example workflows we cannot handle (thanks for the example before regarding prepayments). Any contributions in both are welcome :-) Best Wishes, Chris Travers > > I would be happy to knock out a few b

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Thoughts on payment handling in 1.4.x

2007-04-29 Thread Chris Travers
On 4/29/07, David Tangye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, 2007-04-28 at 09:40 -0700, Chris Travers wrote: > > Hi Ed; > > > > > > > I can't help wondering if the current Quotes/Order/Invoice model isn't > > > slightly too few states for som

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] locating services using SQL

2007-05-04 Thread Chris Travers
Yes. That is correct. On 5/4/07, Charley Tiggs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LSMB 1.2.4 > > Is there anything in particular that I need to check for when locating > services using SQL? Here's the SQL statement I have currently: > > SELECT id, partnumber, description > FROM parts > WHERE inventory

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Collaboration/merger with Ledger-SMB compatible Java project?

2007-05-06 Thread Chris Travers
er, I am fairly certain your approach will require some minor tweaking for 1.2, and more major rewrites for later versions. Unfortunately, this is the price to pay for getting rid of a broken architecture. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 5/6/07, David L. Smith-Uchida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrot

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Collaboration/merger with Ledger-SMB compatible Java project?

2007-05-06 Thread Chris Travers
cess, the order is closed anyway). I looked at trying to fix this at one point and concluded that it was best to wait until we could actually tackle the real issues behind shipping and order management (which are not sanely handled). Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 5/6/07, David L. Smith-Uchida &l

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Speaking of DB schema

2007-05-06 Thread Chris Travers
We have some autogenerated documentation in doc/database (currently only in branches/1.2 and appropriate tags-- will add to /trunk shortly). Hope this helps, Chris Travers On 5/6/07, David L. Smith-Uchida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I've been poking around in the code repository a

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Speaking of DB schema

2007-05-06 Thread Chris Travers
Hi David; I got this committed in /trunk too. The entire db schema is somewhat unstable at the moment but it will get more stable in coming releases. As this happens, more comments, etc. will appear in this documentation. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 5/6/07, Chris Travers <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Corner cases

2007-05-06 Thread Chris Travers
osals regarding how something should work, and we can work with you to get the stored procedures and db structure right. I can't guarantee it will make it into 1.3, but it may at least give a head start for 1.4 and make that happen faster. Best WIshes, Chris Travers > > Cheers, > Dave Smith

[Ledger-smb-devel] The current thinking on the next LedgerSMB architecture.

2007-05-07 Thread Chris Travers
Hi all; This is an attempt to summarize for the record our current architectural approach. If there are no concerns, comments, are clarifications needed, I would like to put it on our web site. Best Wishes, Chris Travers I: Base Architecture Goals === The new architecture

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] proposing Section 508 compliance as requirement for 2.x

2007-05-11 Thread Chris Travers
ishes, Chris Travers On 5/11/07, Tony Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 2007-04-26 at 10:12 +0100, Ed W wrote: > As an aside, whilst I am not saying that it's impossible to do this > all > with only sessions, I am actually baffled as to how it could be done > and &g

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] The current thinking on the next LedgerSMB architecture.

2007-05-14 Thread Chris Travers
are working on them one piece at a time, as it comes up, and as we can get to it. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] how much to consult for a food co-op

2007-05-15 Thread Chris Travers
you to send me the requirements because I have more familiarity with the software and the current codebase. Assuming others can help, I can be a resource for them Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 5/15/07, Herb Vanden Dool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Just in case some of you aren't on the

[Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB 1.2.5 released

2007-05-17 Thread Chris Travers
LedgerSMB 1.2.5 has been released. This release includes major bugfixes for users of 1.000,00 and 1000,00 number formats. Users with these number formats are urged to upgrade as soon as possible. The release also includes a number of UTF-related fixes. Users who require umlauts, multibyte chara

[Ledger-smb-devel] Hotfix available for LedgerSMB 1.2.5 error

2007-05-18 Thread Chris Travers
ncing this problem has the following options: 1) Downgrade to 1.2.4 (just requires untarring over the top) 2) Contacting me for an appropriate hotfix (I will send you a replacement Form.pm). 3) Download Form.pm from SVN (branches/1.2). Best Wishes, Chr

[Ledger-smb-devel] Hotfix for 1.2.5: Corrupted Dates on Financial Statements

2007-05-18 Thread Chris Travers
1.2.4. Best Wishes, Chris Travers - This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforg

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-announce] Hotfix available for LedgerSMB 1.2.5 error

2007-05-18 Thread Chris Travers
You probably still need to get the new Form.pm. The problem is not in the data or the database schema but one of the queries that was rewritten in order to get better performance on systems with large databases. If you need me to, I can send it to you. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On 5/18/07

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >