Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Moving towards 1.3 release candidates

2010-02-10 Thread Luke
On Tue, 9 Feb 2010, Chris Travers wrote: The major issues I am aware of at present (with beta 2) are: 1) Can't print checks from single-payment interface 2) Installation could use a bit more automation 3) David Mora has brought up an accounting issue on how credit notes are handled when a

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LedgerSMB 1.2.20 release 1 available for download

2010-02-20 Thread Luke
Did you get my minor template fixes? They weren't patches, but I emailed them early this week or late last. Luke On Fri, 19 Feb 2010, Chris Travers wrote: Hi all; LedgerSMB 1.2.20-rc1 is available for download. Changelog as follows: Changelog for 1.2.20 * Commented out credits

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] file ownership, or INSTALL vs INSTALL.manual vs install.sh vs README in 1.3.0b3

2010-02-27 Thread Luke
Is it officially Ledger-SMB, or LedgerSMB? LedgerSMB is used in documentation and conversations, but according to this some directories are called Ledger-SMB. My preference is without the dash, if it matters. Luke On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Adam Thompson wrote: (applicable to SVN trunk and AFAIK

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] file ownership, or INSTALL vs INSTALL.manual vs install.sh vs README in 1.3.0b3

2010-02-27 Thread Luke
. JMO. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] file ownership, or INSTALL vs INSTALL.manual vs install.sh vs README in 1.3.0b3

2010-02-27 Thread Luke
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: Is it officially Ledger-SMB, or LedgerSMB? My preference is without the dash, if it matters. We used to be Ledger-SMB. Now we are LedgerSMB. In 1.2 there were still some

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] file ownership, or INSTALL vs INSTALL.manual vs install.sh vs README in 1.3.0b3

2010-02-27 Thread Luke
On Sat, 27 Feb 2010, Adam Thompson wrote: On 2010-Feb-27 16:46, Luke wrote: However, if the /path/to stuff really serves some purpose (as in: there are two ledgersmb13 directories? although how this would differentiate that, I don't know), I suppose it could stay. Still, the section title

[Ledger-smb-devel] SO Reports bug in 1.2.X

2010-03-02 Thread Luke
given the respect it deserves. Is this expected behavior? Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications

[Ledger-smb-devel] Three Possible Bugs in 1.2.X

2010-03-02 Thread Luke
, but if I don't have a screw loose, is this a reasonable change for 1.4? Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Three Possible Bugs in 1.2.X

2010-03-02 Thread Luke
On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Luke wrote: I am still on 1.2.18--but I don't think I read of these being fixed. Base situation: * Service with cost $10.45 and sellprice $11.00 added to sales order. * Service is taxable, but customer is not. * Sales order posted. * Generated purchase order from sales

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Three Possible Bugs in 1.2.X

2010-03-03 Thread Luke
to keep using LSMB for this element of business. Although, if it preserved changed descriptions, I suppose pulling itemnotes would be not a big deal, so I don't have much hope for that--I'd guess it's using the stock inventory description, rather than the one on the order, but haven't tested. Luke

[Ledger-smb-devel] Vendor Invoice bug in 1.2.X

2010-03-03 Thread Luke
invoices. I have not tested setting actual terms (or days at least) on a vendor, to see if that makes a difference, but 0 days should be assumed, and a same day date generated. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Working draft of Application Security Policy for LedgerSMB 1.3

2010-03-03 Thread Luke
On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Adam Thompson wrote: Social engineering attacks cannot be corrected on the server and must be solved via user training. s/on the server/in software/ Niteus minorus: s/in software/by software/ Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Three Possible Bugs in 1.2.X

2010-03-03 Thread Luke
.:) It is a hack, any way you stack it, but your original does have greater scalability. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Working draft of Application Security Policy for LedgerSMB 1.3

2010-03-04 Thread Luke
of duties here have to do with concerns other than those which we have chosen to target for this release. s/here have to do with/in this context, relate to/ Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Encrypted bank account info

2010-03-05 Thread Luke
from gaining access to the full info; and above that the point is moot because they'll get it anyway. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Looking beyond 1.3: Kernalization andrequirements proposals.

2010-03-06 Thread Luke
process of 1.3, although I could be vastly wrong about that. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Looking beyond 1.3: Kernalization and requirements proposals.

2010-03-06 Thread Luke
using modules/addons, or you can take somebody's best guess as to what your type of business needs, and start from that with a preconfigured package. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Looking beyond 1.3: Kernalization and requirements proposals.

2010-03-06 Thread Luke
, and you will doubtless recommend not using the 2.x style addon on production servers anyway. I'm probably missing the point. Luke On Sat, 6 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: One more interesting idea I wonder if it would be helpful to make the core framework for 2.0 into an addon for 1.3

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposed Architecture Changes in 2.0 (Request for comments)

2010-03-06 Thread Luke
, or it can supersede that action, or precede it. Correct? You will need a weight system. Luke (now NATech on #ledgersmb) -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for 2.0: SODA 2.0

2010-03-08 Thread Luke
apologize for wasting your time with this. However Adam's comments reinforced what I had started thinking while reading your original message--that being that this strikes me as a level of complexity and obscurity too far.. Regards, Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Should we switch to a dcvs for 2.0?

2010-03-09 Thread Luke
. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got

[Ledger-smb-devel] Template bug in 1.2.18

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
as well. r...@pecunia:/usr/share/ledgersmb/templates/nat# egrep * -nie '\?lsmb +end +if' packing_list.tex:104:?lsmb end if ? purchase_order.tex:136:?lsmb end if ? work_order.tex:161:?lsmb end if ? Regards, Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Error Handling in 2.0

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
as well. That way we could use SQL State codes as error id's as well. Seems reasonable. Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Global Namespaces

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: Follow-up question: Should we have a separate .ini file for web application configuration? What non-DB-driven web application configuration parameters exist? I.E. those which are not handled in the webserver config. Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Global Namespaces

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
musing. Luke On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, John Locke wrote: Just reading back through the architecture threads, and I think it all mostly sounds great, I like the direction you're going. One thing comes to mind: I don't see a way of detecting in the Request struct the difference between a query

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Global Namespaces

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
Wouldn't it be somewhat more secure, not to use get at all? Or, at least, very minimally? We won't be sending passwords that way any more, but still... Luke On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:32 AM, John Locke m...@freelock.com wrote: Just reading back

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Global Namespaces

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
library support. I think we need to be able to handle both -- at least speaking as someone who does a lot of integration work. Cheers, John Original Message Subject: Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Global Namespaces From: Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com To: Development

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Global Namespaces

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: Furthermore, if we agree that data shouldn't be saved

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] ready to branch 1.3 off?

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
be all over that idea, but I doubt most others would. Luke On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: Ok. Seems like a consensus has emerged. Shelve this until we get to the release candidate series. Best Wishes, Chris Travers

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] partsvendor, entity_id and vendor_id

2010-03-13 Thread Luke
take a crack at it next month. Luke On Sat, 13 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Ian Goodacre ian.gooda...@xtra.co.nz wrote: On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 12:49 -0800, Chris Travers wrote: If it's ok with you... It certainly is. And thanks for the prompt attention. I

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] SSL explanation (was: Re: Global Namespaces)

2010-03-14 Thread Luke
might have got there. I certainly should have, and I'm going to tell myself that I would have, if I had only taken the time to really think about it. Yeah, that's the ticket. That fine writeup goes into my useful stuff to keep around and forward file. Luke

[Ledger-smb-devel] nan.00 in transfers (1.2.X)

2010-03-16 Thread Luke
memo Why we got a NaN.00 in the credit field for the second asset account?:) Fortunately, removing it and updating does not cause it to come back. Still, though, what might have caused it to appear in the first place? Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Three Possible Bugs in 1.2.X

2010-03-17 Thread Luke
On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:41 AM, Chris Travers chris.trav...@gmail.com wrote: On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 6:57 AM, David Godfrey lsmb...@sbts.com.au wrote: Hi Luke I apologize in advance if I have misunderstood your need. As Chris has determined

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] SL 2.8 to LedgerSMB 1.2

2010-03-17 Thread Luke
year. I think I had just upgraded to the first 2.8 version when I decided to switch to LedgerSMB in production. Luke On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: Hi all; Late last night I completed a migration for a customer from SQL-Ledger 2.8 to LedgerSMB 1.2. It wasn't a tremendous

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] SL 2.8 to LedgerSMB 1.2

2010-03-18 Thread Luke
Very nice--thanks for this. It will help a lot. Luke On Wed, 17 Mar 2010, Chris Travers wrote: The first part was to move the defaults data over. alter table defaults add column setting_key text, value text; alter table defaults add column setting_key text; alter table defaults add column

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Minor typo in Form.pm and couple of questions

2010-03-20 Thread Luke
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010, Armaghan Saqib wrote: And just my two queries: 1. It seems that 1.2 schema is same as that of SL 2.6. right? (except the userconf/session tables) I believe defaults table is different as well. Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Bug in 1.2.18

2010-03-23 Thread Luke
Chris, bump... No new content. On Sun, 24 Jan 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Sat, Jan 23, 2010 at 9:59 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: I believe I've found a bug in 1.2.18. Can someone confirm? Go to cash - payments. Select all, update. At this point you're asked to choose

[Ledger-smb-devel] 1.2 item not on file thoughts

2010-03-28 Thread Luke
to shine a light on typos, that would seem to be a strange omission. Would I be alone in considering this a bug? Luke -- Download Intel#174; Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] How can I help?

2010-04-05 Thread Luke
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Ian Goodacre wrote: On Tue, 2010-03-30 at 22:33 -0400, Luke wrote: However, have you tried the IRC channel #ledgersmb to talk to the devs about any of this? Thanks for the suggestion. I might try it, but don't use IRC otherwise Ditto. and, being in NZ, schedule might

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for 2.0: New monetary data types

2010-04-05 Thread Luke
into the background if not needed, seems rather slim. Luke On Mon, 5 Apr 2010, Michael Richardson wrote: Chris == Chris Travers ch...@metatrontech.com writes: Chris Also this will be broken off and implemented in C as a Chris Pg-foundry project and the goal would be to keep this Chris

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Changing tax.pm in 1.21 for a new tax which replaces two old taxes

2010-07-06 Thread Luke
about it. Luke On Mon, 5 Jul 2010, Chris Travers wrote: Currently what I'm doing for my customers is to set the rate to 0 effective when the tax is no longer collected, and to remove it from the drop down once no more invoices could be generated (usually at next book close). One change

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] New to list + SMTP authentication when sending email

2010-07-19 Thread Luke
. Regards, Luke -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB

2010-07-25 Thread Luke
to populate over the coming months. Glad that's finally happening! Luke -- This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone? Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Outsourcing payroll (was Re: Upcoming 2.0 of LedgerSMB)

2010-07-28 Thread Luke
. None of my incorporated clients bother handling it in house any more either (non-profits and midsized companies of no more than 12 employees). Luke -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] FOSSExperts

2010-07-29 Thread Luke
, lifted from film in many cases), for which you must enter a few words of the phrase in order to pass. I have tested those, and found that they do not always work in Linux browsers, although IE has no problem with them.:) Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] FOSSExperts

2010-07-29 Thread Luke
of captcha false negatives, making text alternatives more acceptable. Luke -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Features you would like to see in 2.0

2010-07-29 Thread Luke
. You should still be able to see it on historical reports, but other than that it should be able to go away. That requires a lot more COA logic than we have now, of course. Luke -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Features you would like to see in 2.0

2010-07-29 Thread Luke
reason I always print then review, before posting, unless I'm in some absurd hurry.:) Luke -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Features you would like to see in 2.0

2010-07-29 Thread Luke
type (enum: original, internal, additional) added (timestamp) note Originals can be created (unique per invoice) and viewed. Internals can be created and viewed. Additionals can be created, viewed, edited, and deleted. I can think of a few alternatives, but that's what popped into mind. Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Features you would like to see in 2.0

2010-07-30 Thread Luke
posting), although 1.3 may already have that. Luke -- The Palm PDK Hot Apps Program offers developers who use the Plug-In Development Kit to bring their C/C++ apps to Palm for a share of $1 Million in cash or HP Products

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Features you would like to see in 2.0

2010-08-11 Thread Luke
this for you, assuming that means what I consider it to mean. What would also probably solve it, is account statement capability. They would post as separate invoices, but you could invoice them with a statement each month. Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Infrastructure, was: Proposal: New web site maintainers

2010-10-04 Thread Luke
, Luke P.S. A minor matter of terminology, while I'm ranting: why is it a core committee, and not a core team, as with many open source projects? -- Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Infrastructure, was: Proposal: New web site maintainers

2010-10-05 Thread Luke
On Mon, 4 Oct 2010, Chris Travers wrote: On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 1:56 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: If you don't like the result, advise them.  If you still don't like it, fire them and find somebody else.  But the management by central committee approach has not really worked

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Reconciliation in 1.3

2010-12-13 Thread Luke
might be a good thing? Why first X and not entire thing? I would definitely like to see the payee name, or at least some of it. Luke -- Lotusphere 2011 Register now for Lotusphere 2011 and learn how to connect the dots

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Taxability on past invoices

2011-01-14 Thread Luke
On Fri, 14 Jan 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 1:18 AM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: I suppose that this is an old problem, but... In 1.2, if an invoice is posted for a non-taxable customer, and that customer later becomes taxable, the invoice in reports

[Ledger-smb-devel] Required by dates on order templates

2011-02-22 Thread Luke
it was to be consistent with the deliverydate of invoices? Luke -- Index, Search Analyze Logs and other IT data in Real-Time with Splunk Collect, index and harness all the fast moving IT data generated by your applications, servers

[Ledger-smb-devel] Sales Tax Bug

2011-04-15 Thread Luke
In 2.6.18, if an old invoice had a salestax rate of 1% on it, and that invoice is opened after the rate has changed to 2%, the tax shown will be at the 2% rate. That makes reversing that invoice a tricky prospect. Has this been fixed in later 2.6 versions? Thanks Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Sales Tax Bug

2011-04-15 Thread Luke
On Fri, 15 Apr 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 12:43 AM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: In 2.6.18, if an old invoice had a salestax rate of 1% on it, Geeze. That's what I get for asking questions at that hour. 1.2.18. and that invoice is opened after the rate

[Ledger-smb-devel] Can't Save Preferences

2011-04-16 Thread Luke
) Language same (English) Session timeout same (10) Stylesheet same Printer same (blank) Luke -- Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Can't Save Preferences

2011-04-17 Thread Luke
A successful access attempt to am.pl; no errors. Nothing about the attempt in the PostGreSQL log. Here seems to be the get request: /ledgersmb/am.pl?path=bin/lynxaction=configlevel=Preferenceslogin=me@usrnametimeout=sessionid=js= Luke On Sat, 16 Apr 2011, Chris Travers wrote: anything

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Can't Save Preferences

2011-04-18 Thread Luke
Have you been able to duplicate this? Luke On Sun, 17 Apr 2011, Chris Travers wrote: I am looking into this. Stay tuned. Best Wishes, Chris Travers On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: A successful access attempt to am.pl; no errors. Nothing about

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Can't Save Preferences

2011-04-18 Thread Luke
that appears as the selected id on most customers, and is the main employee_id in the audittrail. Could the fact that the login in the table is user, but the login used to log in is user@co be relevant? Luke -- Benefiting from

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Can't Save Preferences

2011-04-18 Thread Luke
. Is this issue linked to what I am experiencing now--some change in the code that broke them both? Luke -- Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Can't Save Preferences

2011-04-19 Thread Luke
On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: On Mon, 18 Apr 2011, Chris Travers wrote: Could the fact that the login in the table is user, but the login used to log in is user@co be relevant? My reading of the code

[Ledger-smb-devel] Possible Bug in 1.2.21

2011-04-20 Thread Luke
While using admin.pl (path=bin/lynx, but not sure if that matters) in 1.2.21, deleting a user seems to return an HTML document with a blank line at the top, which causes it not to render. Can someone confirm? Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Possible Bug in 1.2.21

2011-04-20 Thread Luke
Interesting. I can't make this happen consistently myself. Luke On Wed, 20 Apr 2011, Luke wrote: While using admin.pl (path=bin/lynx, but not sure if that matters) in 1.2.21, deleting a user seems to return an HTML document with a blank line at the top, which causes it not to render. Can

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Can't Save Preferences

2011-04-20 Thread Luke
all my usernames. Probably not many LSMB users were using that feature anyway, since it never worked as it did in SL. Luke -- Benefiting from Server Virtualization: Beyond Initial Workload Consolidation -- Increasing

[Ledger-smb-devel] Duedate bug in 1.2.20

2011-04-29 Thread Luke
. What should happen, is the same thing that does on sales invoices for blank due dates. What does happen, is an insert error for a blank date type. Luke -- WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software The most

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-18 Thread Luke
for anyone who hates non-git repositories. Luke -- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows* and Linux* C/C

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [Ledger-smb-users] Future of LedgerSMB: Ideas and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
with that, if it can be installed successfully and predictably. I'd say they are close to equal, but I'd maybe put installation first. Just my .02 Luke -- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Status of 1.3 Code Documentation and RFC

2011-05-19 Thread Luke
, expected globals altered, and purpose of function. Luke -- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read this article and learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools to help Windows

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LSMB mails appearing as 'www-data'

2011-05-20 Thread Luke
be set globally, and put a checkbox in preferences for whether to use it. Speaking of such things, do we have a company wide BCC for outgoing email yet? Luke-- What Every C/C++ and Fortran developer Should Know! Read

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LSMB mails appearing as 'www-data'

2011-05-20 Thread Luke
On Fri, 20 May 2011, Erik Huelsmann wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:35 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: On Fri, 20 May 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Erik Huelsmann ehu...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, With the patch I sent a few minutes ago, I'm able

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] in-progress install script

2011-05-25 Thread Luke
The line which says: cat CREATE_USER | $pgslq_cmd Should be: cat CREATE_USER | $pgsql_cmd Also, would it be more correct for the line which is: for i in `grep -v -E '^#' sql/modules/LOADORDER` To be?: for i in `grep -v -E '^[[:space:]]*#' sql/modules/LOADORDER` Luke On Wed, 25 May 2011

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] in-progress install script

2011-05-25 Thread Luke
$company_name 2. Where is the script getting $company_name? 3. Shouldn't ledgersmb be variablized? Luke On Wed, 25 May 2011, Erik Huelsmann wrote: Hi Chris, The script below is an in-progress install script that should reduce the amount of knowledge required to get LSMB installed

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] State of Perl-based database setup utilities for LedgerSMB 1.3

2011-05-27 Thread Luke
probably be a required pending step upon first admin login. I would personally prefer as much possible to be integrated into the app's first run, although I don't necessarily expect that in 1.3. Luke -- vRanger cuts

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] user creation rfc

2011-05-27 Thread Luke
risks? That would also be my preference. I can see both ways of looking at it, of course, but I would probably need it active more than not, and it would be annoying to use a patch or add-on for something that seems perfectly amenable to a runtime configuration option. Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] State of Perl-based database setup utilities for LedgerSMB 1.3

2011-05-27 Thread Luke
. If that means that some users need Make, then so be it *for those users*. Luke -- vRanger cuts backup time in half-while increasing security. With the market-leading solution for virtual backup and recovery, you get blazing-fast

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] State of Perl-based database setup utilities for LedgerSMB 1.3

2011-05-30 Thread Luke
it? I am suggesting that you could handicap your admin user (we could provide a script for this), so that creations can be done by web interface using that admin user, but deletions would have to be done manually. Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] State of Perl-based database setup utilities for LedgerSMB 1.3

2011-05-31 Thread Luke
. Luke-- Simplify data backup and recovery for your virtual environment with vRanger. Installation's a snap, and flexible recovery options mean your data is safe, secure and there when you need it. Data protection magic? Nope

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [RFC] prepare-database script

2011-06-02 Thread Luke
The name of the database to be created for the company [*] --owner The name of the superuser which is to become owner of the company's database [$owner] Luke On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Erik Huelsmann wrote: The attached patch is a slightly improved version because the other

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] [RFC] prepare-database script

2011-06-02 Thread Luke
Here's one to add root checking: --- ./prepare-company-database.sh 2011-06-02 18:23:26.851794751 -0400 +++ ./prepare-company-database.sh.new 2011-06-02 19:47:01.0 -0400 @@ -74,6 +74,13 @@ } +# Am I root? +if ! test `whoami` = root +then +echo Warning: you are not running as

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Development progress

2011-06-15 Thread Luke
debatable, but I don't see that it is doing anything critical for the user experience by being on. Suggested patch follows... Luke --- orig/tools/prepare-company-database.sh 2011-06-14 22:03:22.0 + +++ ledgersmb/tools/prepare-company-database.sh 2011-06-16 00:33:47.0 +

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Development progress

2011-06-15 Thread Luke
probably the desired outcome at that point, but... Luke -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Development progress

2011-06-15 Thread Luke
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, David A. Bandel wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 20:04, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: Using the prepare script from revision 3248, I found some oddities. First, in the usage, the usage line implies that all options are optional (scriptname [option1 .. optionN

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Notices when creating tables

2011-06-15 Thread Luke
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: (1.3 installation) Not being a PostGreSQL expert, should I be concerned at the rather huge number of these notices during installation? NOTICE:  CREATE TABLE will create

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Minor failure in 1.3

2011-06-15 Thread Luke
, in an endless loop (I.E. they never seem to work). Luke On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Luke wrote: In ledgersmb.conf, I have: default_db = testco Going to http://server/ledgersmb/ gets me the refresh, followed by a request for company, and a login button. My beliefe from the configuration

[Ledger-smb-devel] Revised patches to the prep script

2011-06-16 Thread Luke
Note: these were made against a pristine version of the script so they can be applied to the version in sources, not relying on my earlier patches. As a result, this first one is the second patch which fixes the pgslq typo. To make them both applicable, I have revised the first one (which

[Ledger-smb-devel] Further patches to prepare-company-database.sh

2011-06-16 Thread Luke
, but these only make sense together. Luke--- orig/tools/prepare-company-database.sh 2011-06-16 17:23:23.0 + +++ prepare-company-database.sh 2011-06-16 19:06:10.0 + @@ -74,6 +74,25 @@ } +# Function to remove unnecessary chatter from PSQL, as well as +# some notices and errors

[Ledger-smb-devel] delete-company-database.sh concerns and patch

2011-06-16 Thread Luke
with a greater understanding could have a look at my proposed usage, and the script itself, and confirm (or edit the patch to make it correct), it would be better. Thanks Luke--- orig/tools/delete-company-database.sh 2011-06-14 22:03:22.0 + +++ delete-company-database.sh 2011-06-16

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] On insertion patterns: INSERT garbage + UPDATE true values vs INSERT true values

2011-06-17 Thread Luke
associated with that ID. (or not) Anyway, it was a random thought I had while reading this, which may be negated by the workings of modern PostGreSQL (I've been more of a developer of applications which use MySQL). I won't be offended by having this ignored for being non-applicable.:) Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Tax account creation: how to 'detect' tax accounts?

2011-06-19 Thread Luke
place? Question: do zero percentage accounts still show up on invoices and such in 1.3? Luke -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Tax account creation: how to 'detect' tax accounts?

2011-06-19 Thread Luke
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:47 PM, o1bigtenor o1bigte...@gmail.com wrote: On Sun, Jun 19, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: On Sun, 19 Jun 2011, Erik Huelsmann wrote: On gTalk, we agreed the best course of action is to add

[Ledger-smb-devel] Potential Backup bug in 1.2.21

2011-06-20 Thread Luke
, is it really a good idea to start a filename with a dash? Obviously, the database name is not being prepended. For reference, when I do a save to disk for the same backup, instead of emailing, the name is: MyDatasetName-1.2.0-20110611.sqlc Which is the name it should be given. Luke

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Employee search question for 1.3

2011-06-20 Thread Luke
, on the email page for where to send an invoice. Luke -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool. Experience the power of Track Changes, Inline Image Editing and ensure content

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Employee search question for 1.3

2011-06-20 Thread Luke
it by manually mailing invoices and orders in those cases, but I thought I'd throw it out there as a point of discussion. Luke -- EditLive Enterprise is the world's most technically advanced content authoring tool

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Bug/Patch: email form not populated with emails from account

2011-06-24 Thread Luke
Can I just put in a plug for that company wide automatic BCC again?:) I haven't checked to see if that's in 1.3, but if not, which I think is the case, that's one feature that should make it in before RC. On Fri, 24 Jun 2011, Erik Huelsmann wrote: Hi John, I've isolated the error

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LSMB 1.3: Same user, multiple companies?

2011-06-30 Thread Luke
have been known to run up to ten active company databases at once, and having to use different users is most annoying. So I have a vested interest in this being supported. Luke -- All of the data generated in your

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] LSMB 1.3: Same user, multiple companies?

2011-07-02 Thread Luke
than the regular or even power users. My $.02, and I'm fine with whatever ultimately, but the above would be my preference. Luke -- All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable. Why

Re: [Ledger-smb-devel] Proposal for file attachment API

2011-07-04 Thread Luke
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011, Chris Travers wrote: On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 11:28 PM, Luke account...@lists.tacticus.com wrote: I was expecting that, yes.  However, I shouldn't.  My recent experience is with reasonably disciplined corporate users, who either get files from sources with likely

  1   2   >