My appologies to the list. I meant to send that private.
btw- the appology is for sending it public- not for what was said.
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net wrote:
From: Janis L Gilmore rajan...@earthlink.net
Subject: [LegacyUG] Rudeness to the list
To:
responding in
the correct manner to this post but I am sure I will read
about it if I have not followed the guidelines correctly.
Gail Dyer
Wynthner wrote:
Look Lady- either get an e-mail address you can set to
ALWAYS send in plain text or quit posting- got it?? !!
PS- And I don't
Bill...
Repeatedly posting is *not* a small infraction- it is, rather, a gross assault
on the list and the members thereof.
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, Bill Wilson oldgoa...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bill Wilson oldgoa...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Apple
To:
As someone once said...
Moderation in all thngs- *even moderation*!
;)
--- On Wed, 1/14/09, RobinH robinsn...@actrix.co.nz wrote:
From: RobinH robinsn...@actrix.co.nz
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Apple
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Wednesday, January 14, 2009, 7:58 PM
Any forum
Dell's early power supply connectors were non-standard... and a few other
connectors if I recall correctly.
--- On Tue, 1/13/09, Mike Fry mike...@iafrica.com wrote:
From: Mike Fry mike...@iafrica.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Survey: Error 91
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date:
Look Lady- either get an e-mail address you can set to ALWAYS send in plain
text or quit posting- got it?? !!
PS- And I don't care how olds you are- age is no excuse for stupidity!
--- On Tue, 1/13/09, momalo...@aol.com momalo...@aol.com wrote:
From: momalo...@aol.com momalo...@aol.com
It really ought to be a cardinal rule for all computer users that any PC should
have a cold boot after any update. You'd be amazed at the little problems it
prevents.
--- On Sat, 1/10/09, ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com wrote:
From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG]
It may have something to do with those two items having some 16 bit code in
them.
While 32 bit Vista can handle old 16 bit code 64 bit Vista can't. There is
another program on the market that has the same problem in one of its modules.
--- On Fri, 1/9/09, Sherry/Support
Ibid should ONLY used if the source IMMEDIATELY preceding it is exactly the
same in ALL respects.
If there is an intervening source other standards apply.
--- On Tue, 1/6/09, ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com wrote:
From: ronald ferguson ronfe...@msn.com
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid feature
Perhaps, then again, perhaps not...
But until a full explaination of just why the feature was pulled and the
warning issued one is left to wonder.
--- On Tue, 1/6/09, Elizabeth Richardson erich...@worldnet.att.net wrote:
From: Elizabeth Richardson erich...@worldnet.att.net
Subject: Re:
Source it just like that... Unidentified Newspaper Clipping.
You could say when/where you obtained it but that is about it.
--- On Sun, 1/4/09, Bernard Doddema doddema...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Bernard Doddema doddema...@gmail.com
Subject: [LegacyUG] how to source unidentified newspaper
Amen!
LUG should do like rootsweb and strip HTML befor it ever gets to the list-
anything else is pre-neanderthal.
--- On Sun, 1/4/09, Ron Bernier ronaldbern...@bernfrin.net wrote:
From: Ron Bernier ronaldbern...@bernfrin.net
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Newbie questions
To:
My personal opinion is that the someone shouldn't be added at all. It should
simply read married. The mere fact of a marriage indicates that there
was another someone involved.
When/if other information is found then it should be entered a another marriage
with full details and the
I *always* enter a 'name' for a marriage partner- even if I don't know it!
A spouse with an unknown name would be entered as:
Given Name:_
Surname:~
Then I chnage it when I get the real name.
--- On Sat, 1/3/09, Elizabeth Richardson erich...@worldnet.att.net wrote:
From: Elizabeth
One works backwards only to a point-say your great grandfather and then you
want to add his descendants( your cousins)- then you start working forward so
sooner or later everyone might well encounter this bug.
--- On Sun, 1/4/09, Elizabeth Richardson erich...@worldnet.att.net wrote:
From:
If your birthday was 1 jan 1900 then on 1 jan 1901 you would have entered your
2nd year.
--- On Wed, 12/31/08, Mike Fry mike...@iafrica.com wrote:
From: Mike Fry mike...@iafrica.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Home Tab Problem
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Wednesday,
Jill,
Just my personal opinion but my feeling is that flash drives should only be
used to transfer files between computers and never used as a long term storage
device or to actually run files from a flash drive. Too many chances for
something to go wrong. Better to backup to an external drive,
The thing is the end-user should NOT have to re-configure anything-period.
Preventing this type of situation is clearly the responsibility of the mailing
list owner...
besides, who in their right mind makes a rule that they have no way of
enforcing??
--- On Sat, 12/27/08, Hope Bagot Bees
I think what she is saying is that she has a v.7 family file but has
uninstalled version 7 and only has v.6 on her machine- thus she can't open the
v7 file to gedcom anything out.
--- On Fri, 12/26/08, Rachel Alliston rallis...@swiftdsl.com.au wrote:
From: Rachel Alliston
They *really* need to do something about their maillist software and/or their
servers to prevent just this sort of thing- even if it means raising the price
to pay for it!
--- On Sat, 12/27/08, Carl Cox ct...@getgoin.net wrote:
From: Carl Cox ct...@getgoin.net
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Need
I'd go with one-I just find it easier in case I find a person that would link
to two different files. No duplicate sources, etc to set up or special
customized items to remeber in which set.
--- On Sun, 12/21/08, Howard Mathieson hmathie...@shaw.ca wrote:
From: Howard Mathieson
The *only* Golden Rule I've found for merging is...
DON'T DO IT!
(grin)
I'm like you- it always seems to create more problems than it solves.
--- On Tue, 12/16/08, Hope Bagot Bees hopebagot.b...@virgin.net wrote:
From: Hope Bagot Bees hopebagot.b...@virgin.net
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG]
I've been convinced from the beginning that the source conversion feature was
unworkable. Considering how unique each person does their sources I fail to see
any way all those variations can be taken into account and rendered into one
standard source.
--- On Fri, 12/12/08, JLB j...@telus.net
I fully agree!
Just as one shouldn't try to paint the Mona Lisa with a chain saw, neither
should one try to sculpt a David with a paint brush.
Perhaps what is really needed is a third party full bodied, fully customizable,
user friendly report generator
--- On Tue, 12/9/08, ronald ferguson
In other words... dumb it down; the same solution that has led to the collapse
of the american education system.
Standards are standards because they do *not* change. One either tries to meet
standards or one doesn't.
Those who try to meet the standards are called serious genealogists, those
I can't see a biography as an event or as a note. I'd make the biography a
source (relative A being the source of the source) and then add the events in
the biography with whatever additional notes were needed.
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: [EMAIL
As Sylvester the cat would say...
Exaticaly!
--- On Thu, 12/4/08, Dennis Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dennis Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Listserv spam/HTML issues (Was: Legacy Question)
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Thursday, December
Rootsweb uses the Mailman Mailing List program which is a commercial program
and has, in fact, restricted a lot of the bells and whistles it allows.
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, John B. Lisle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: John B. Lisle [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Listserv spam/HTML
Sorry, but ALL users ahould have their e-mail client set to send ONLY in text.
HTML should never, Never, NEVER, be used in e-mail-for *any* reason-period.
Truth be told, Emails clients shouldn't even recognize HTML. Browsers yes-
E-Mail clients no.
--- On Tue, 12/2/08, Steve Voght [EMAIL
Then I *strongly* suggest you get new Mailing List Software.
Just corious but what Mailing List software do you use?
--- On Wed, 12/3/08, Sherry/Support [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Sherry/Support [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Listserv spam/HTML issues (Was: Legacy Question)
There was a Frenchman who produced such a program (Geneweb). Google will find
it. IIRC, there were even a couple of websites that specialized in displaying
its output.
--- On Fri, 11/28/08, ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE:
I just have two questions for list members...
Of all the people you have shared your genealogy information how many have gone
thru the trouble to actually check your sources?
Do you check the sources of all information you recieve?
My feeling is that unless you are preparing to actually
Imho, for what it is worth...
The Website is the repository and the particular webpage is the source (and
hopefully cites its source).
--- On Sat, 11/22/08, Jennifer Trahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jennifer Trahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing a family association
Wouldn't the easiest way be to just create another Master Source
Correspondence, Joe Bloggs-Fanny Adams
--- On Sun, 11/23/08, Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing emails
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
As I was once told by a rather well-known genealogist...
A source is that which records the occurance of an event.
--- On Tue, 11/18/08, Dennis M. Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Dennis M. Kowallek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Tagging/Events was ([LegacyUG] Searching Location notes
--- On Tue, 11/18/08, Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It all depends entirely on what you mean by
record doesn't it. I could say I have over
2,000 records in my family file: (meaning over 2000
individuals) but I could also say I have several records for
each person, meaning
You won't see it because it isn't there.
A link is nothing *but* text arranged in a certain way so it doesn't matter as
far as list mail goes.
--- On Fri, 11/14/08, Elizabeth Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Elizabeth Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] web pages
Good luck with England!
There are several overlapping jurisdictional systems that can lead to utter
confusion depending on civil district, registration district, etc.
--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Michele Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michele Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LegacyUG]
It depends on the context/how you use it. The full form is The United Kingdom
of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
--- On Thu, 11/13/08, Michele Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Michele Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [LegacyUG] another question about locations
To: Legacy E-Mail List
It is purely a guess but
several features that people have asked for have resulted in a this would
take a major re-write of the entire program type answer- this may well be in
this catagory.
--- On Sat, 11/8/08, Mary Fowler Leek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Mary Fowler Leek [EMAIL
Ah!! An FTM Upgrade!!!
*GRIN!*
--- On Sun, 11/9/08, Ron Bernier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Ron Bernier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy 8 rumours
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Date: Sunday, November 9, 2008, 1:08 AM
Ah.. so that would make the husband's children by the previous marriage and the
wife's children from previous marriage Siblings-in-Law!
*grin*
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sorting children and 1/2
Now *that* is just plain silly!
To have a database with unsearchable fields is, to be blunt about it,
unforgivable in the extreme.
--- On Tue, 10/28/08, ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] looking for cems
To:
Err... if you sort it by cemetery, county, state then what happen to cemeteries
with same name in different counties and/or states?
Wouldn't it be better to sort by state, county, cemetery to keep them all
together?
--- On Wed, 10/29/08, JLB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: JLB [EMAIL
Too many people fail to understand the difference between personal
information and private information.
Names, dates of birth, etc are personal information but they are *not* private.
Bank account numbers, Soc.Sec. Numbers, credit card numbers, etc are private
information.
*ANY* personal
Ancestry has a copy of the original two indexes- note plural but they then
combined those into ONE database and indexed that database so yes- Amazon did
create the database that allows you to view the original pages of the original
two indexes.
--- On Fri, 10/24/08, Elizabeth Richardson
One can not derogatorize Microsoft since, than it, there is nothing lower than!
;)
- Original Message
From: Elizabeth Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, October 19, 2008 8:04:53 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] TIF images attached to sources
Numbers associated with a person aren't important unless those numbers are
serving multiple purposes (like also serving as document numbers, etc.). As to
pedigree numbering, there are several numbering systems in use around the world
so trying to keep them in order is like re-arranging deck
We have recently run into the same thing. My nephew is in the divorce process
now. Since he has formed several close relationships with his soon-to-be-
ex-wife's siblings and their children we have decided to just enter the fact of
the divorce but to keep updating the info on all of her her
AMEN!
Luckily, the program I use has an ID number for each individual you can
change.. but thankfully that does *not* change the internal record number
- Original Message
From: Johnny V [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2008
A ream is approx. 1.75-2.0 inches so 2 3-inch binders would be a tight fit for
1500 sheets.
Better to figure 1 three inch binder per ream.
That was what we used in our lab for our procedure manuals (which we constantly
being updated!).
- Original Message
From: Ruth Nerud [EMAIL
I would beg to differ...
If I buy a certain software package because of a particular way it does a
certain thing and it works properly and then I buy the next upgrade and find
that it has changed the way that certain function works I have a perfect right
to feel somewhat less than warm and
There is also the use of witnesses.
The witnesses in TMG do not transfer to GEDCOM and if the cousin has used them
to a great extent it would be a major work to re-do them somehow in Legacy.
I do like one report Legacy does better than the same TMG report...
The Kinship /Relatives Report in
TMG=The Master Genealogist
- Original Message
From: M Stowe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, September 1, 2008 7:46:46 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] TMG
Guess this is a strange question but was is TMG?
M.
Legacy User Group
Joseph,
You can. All you have to do is go to one of the National Archives Regional
Offices- but the NA has a LOT less online than Ancestry.
- Original Message
From: Joseph [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2008 7:56:42 AM
Subject:
All I can say is that if someone is not really into genealogy then they are
*very* unlikely to get any type of report from me- lengthly or otherwise..
- Original Message
From: Syble Glasscock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2008
A case can be made that the conflicting genealogies of Jesus are on topic if
the question is how does one enter completely different genealogies for the
same person.
- Original Message
From: Elizabeth Richardson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent:
The first thing I would do is submit a correction on the image page at Ancestry
so that Magyari also show as an alternate name in the Ancestry Index. I've
submitted several and they seem to get them entered pretty quickly.
- Original Message
From: John Magyari [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Better yet- just complain to Sherry et al in an off list message and then let
them handle it.
- Original Message
From: GeoSci [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Legacy User Group LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com
Sent: Sunday, August 3, 2008 12:59:43 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] Off Topic posts on
To the best of my knowledge there is no softwware package that allows
individual sourcing of the day, month, and year of a date, in the same vein
there is no package that allows individual sourcing of street number, street,
city, county, state, and country. I've never understood just why all
Until the major national and international genealogical Societies and Journals
agree on one style of sourcing there will be no standard.
Such agreement is about as likely as Rev. Phelps or Osama Bin Laden being
elected Pope.
- Original Message
From: Kirsten Bowman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think first you have to decide what you mean by tree.
My earliest ancestor with my Surname only goes back to 1812 but my maternal
line goes back to 1708.
If I am doing a SURNAME tree then earliest means one person.. If I am doing
Direct ancestors it is a different person.
Any person in you
If you have the actual clipping in your possession just make a source News
Clippings-unsourced
If you have a copy provided by someone else then they, of course, are the
source and you quote the clipping.
- Original Message
From: PHILLIP O HUSBAND [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
I think we have to distinguish between a marriage and a wedding as they are not
the same thing.
There can only be one Legal marriage ceremony (that which the State recognizes
as granting the legal benefits of marriage) but there can be an infinite number
of wedding ceremonies.
- Original
Imho opinion, the *only* reason to use HTML in either e-mail or Newsgroups is
the sudden onset of complete senility.
HTML was devised for the World Wide Web and should remain there. OIthers, of
course, differ.
- Original Message
From: Jenny M Benson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personally, I
Somehow, I don't think Mr. Velke is rich...
;)
- Original Message
From: Dave Naylor
snip
If you can come up with program code that will sort records by date
and still keep records with blank dates in their correct place then
you'll make a fortune! ;-))
Cheers, -- Dave
--
David
I'd use the cousin and the census for whatever they said about the info your
cousin sent (name, dates, etc.) and the census only for whatever the census
showed that your cousin didnt (occupation, own/rent home, etc.)
- Original Message
From: Christina [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Adding the photos you took would be fine...reproducing the photos from the book
is most likely a violation of copyright and I wouldn't advise using them except
for your personal use (i.e. not passed along to family or put on the web).
- Original Message
From: Gorski Ian [EMAIL
Just my opinion but...
You should only cite as a repository the place where you saw the information-
no matter how many other places that information may be available.
If you had information from a book at your local library would you cite every
library that may have that book?
-
Jane,
At one time I stumbled across a website that had county creation dates and
details for each state so I know one is out there- unfortunately I didn't save
it [sigh]
- Original Message
From: Jane Sarles [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Friday, July
In actuality the US census creates a minimum of two witnesses, one of which is
recorded on the census.
Witness #1 is the person giving the information to the enumerator. That person
witnesses the recording of the information he/she is giving by the enumerator.
Witness #2 is the enumerator, who
, the enumerator.
Elizabeth C
Wynthner wrote:
In actuality the US census creates a minimum of two witnesses, one of which
is recorded on the census.
Witness #1 is the person giving the information to the enumerator. That
person witnesses the recording of the information he/she is giving
Jane,
I've found it best to always enter a birth and death date for anyone I
don't personally know is alive.
Even if I don't know the actual dates one can come up with valid estimates.
A real life example:
My cousin's mother and father were divorced when she was very young and she had
no contact
Exactly!
- Original Message
From: david [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 7:45:54 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Relationship Calculator
I think it's reasonable in that Legacy is showing non-blood people who are
married to a blood
Your uncle is the brother of your father or mother. The husband of your aunt
(your father's or mother's sister) is yoru uncle-in-law.
You are the nephew-in-law, not the nephew, of the husband of your aunt.
Imho, it is not a bug.
- Original Message
From: Chick Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
True, except in the case of planning to publish your work in one of the
professional journals.
If that is the case, it then behooves one to determine the formats said journal
requires before hand and enter data accordingly rather than have to re-do
everything later.
- Original Message
I use ~ for unknown Surnames and _ for unknown given names and then
in the suffix I add Spouse of [insert spouse's name]
- Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2008 2:47:01 PM
It should be noted that a certain school of thought considers the GEDCOM to be
the worst thing ever to befall computerizsed genealogy!
In concept it was great but in implementation by the various companies
(including the LDS itself) it was more than somewhat lacking.
- Original Message
States Steamship Company was using the term into the early 70's.
- Original Message
From: Allen Prunty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 2:46:21 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Standardization
I delete Mr. Miss. Mrs. as its redundant as
Yes, please; and the sooner the better .
*GRIN*
- Original Message
From: Geoff Rasmussen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 11:59:27 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] V7: Accessed date for lumped US Census Entries - for
Geoff
Your
Considering what happened with V7 I'd be surprised if Legacy *ever*, even
vaguely, committed to a certain time frame again- for anything; I'd certainly
not blame them!
- Original Message
From: music-line [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, June 16,
You could... but there might be a better way.
What format is his info in now?
It might be better for him to send you his info in the present form and then
you enter it into Legacy.
You could then have him download Legacy and send him a copy of you family file
to put into his legacy program.
This
I do something of teh same thing excepot I use _ for given names and
~_ for surnames and then in the suffix I put w/o Smith, Peter #..
All without quotes. This allows the entries to sort at the end of the Surnames
index by spouses surname.
- Original Message
From: Dee
Ron,
Just as a matter of interest, who are some of the people in the UK who are
considered authorities on genealogical sourcing? Could any be enticed to help
Legacy with UK Source Templates?
- Original Message
From: ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Ron,
Thanks for the info, it explains a great many things about the different
perspectives.
- Original Message
From: ronald ferguson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, June 9, 2008 4:23:06 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Non-US Censuses in v7
Have you checked the Legacy Message Board at Rootsweb?
- Original Message
From: Judith H [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Saturday, June 7, 2008 9:25:42 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Email list for legacy solutions only?
I too would prefer that type of
I'm curious as to UK practices. Is there a person in UK genealogy similar to
Mills; or a licensing body of some sort; or something on the level of the New
England Genealogical Society?
I'm not saying these are better but just wondering on the state of
organizational differences.
-
Now there is a new idea.. a la cart pricing depending on which special features
you want!
I think I like it... and would hope the cable companies would follow suit.
:)
- Original Message
From: Pat Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, June
It is my understanding that the Source Converter is to be added at some yet
to be determined future date...
let's just pray they don't say soon
;)
- Original Message
From: Jim Keener [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 4, 2008 7:23:26 PM
rates - just pick up that many
pennies in a parking lot somewhere! Get real!
Keith
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Wynthner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jan, sorry about your problems but
If I purchase something and the charge hits my account today then I should be
able to use the product
Jan, sorry about your problems but
If I purchase something and the charge hits my account today then I should be
able to use the product today-PERIOD.
If it takes 24 hours to process the e-mailed password then the account
shouldn't be charged until that e-mail is sent-PERIOD
Why the devil
There can be a great downside to those sent a GEDCOM with non-dates in a date
field; depending on the importing program it may or may not transfer that
non-date data and thus, depending on the preferences of the person recieving
the data, have to be removed by the recieving party.
I personally
Dawn,
What happens when the same person shows up in more than one spot in the
ahnentafel due to inter-generational marriages of cousins, or has a different
spot when the focus of the ahnentafell changes?
- Original Message
From: Dawn Del Guercio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: legacyusergroup
That is your opinion... others may differ.
Indeed, I find it amusing that most programs have been scurrying around trying
to add features that TMG has had for years
What might be interesting is to conduct a survey of the 50 Fellows and see
which, if any, genealogy program they use.
-
If this is the worst you've seen then you obviously missed the FTM2008
trainwreck!
:)
- Original Message
From: Krisjan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 12:11:37 PM
Subject: [LegacyUG] mail from JLB - for Ruth A. (Sconza Testa)
And you just *had* to announce it to the world- right???
How very, *very*, adult.
*PLONK!*
- Original Message
From: Ruth Nerud [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2008 10:53:08 AM
Subject: [LegacyUG] mail from JLB
I have set my e-mail
I may be in error but I read the message to mean she wanted an FTM file
converted directly to a Legacy file without first converting it to a GEDCOM.
Can that be done?
- Original Message
From: Sam Weldon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Monday, May 26,
Not really... it *IS* possible to release both a finished product AND a
complete manual for that product at the same time; all it takes is a bit of
planning and forethought.
- Original Message
From: Wendy Howard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2008
: Sunday, May 25, 2008 5:19:20 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] v7 manual vs reality
Wynther - do you work for FTM?
Elizabeth
researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson
- Original Message -
From: Wynthner
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, May 25
IMHO, Legacy requiring IE7 for certain functions is the biggest blunder by a
software company since Ancestry introduced FTM2008!
It *will* act as a factor limiting sales, I know several people who won't touch
IE7 with a 25 foot pole.
- Original Message
From: Kirsten Bowman [EMAIL
1 - 100 of 177 matches
Mail list logo
