[LegacyUG] preferred line

2008-03-01 Thread Hope Bagot Bees
A week or so back the subject of 'preferred' line was discussed. I've looked back in the archives but can't find an answer to the problem I now have. My direct line is correctly indicated as preferred with bold type and on a family view page which includes a member of the direct line that is

RE: [LegacyUG] preferred line

2008-03-01 Thread ronald ferguson
Elizabeth, Reading your email it seems possible that there is a confusion. The bold print indicates the direct line and the star the preferred child. You can have as may preferred children/lines as you wish and they can be changed by right clicking any child in the family, selecting the

RE: [LegacyUG] Indentation

2008-03-01 Thread rrunion
Cathy - I would be interested in a 'how-to' in using Access to search and replace a tab. I am somewhat familiar with Access, but how does it work exactly? Would I open Access, add the note (to a cell-How?) and do the search/replace - then copy the Access note back into Legacy note? So far, I

RE: [LegacyUG] Indentation

2008-03-01 Thread rrunion
I was unable to make the Access feature work since it indicated that 'there was too much data'; however, I used the same idea in Word (probably work with any word processing). I copied the note in Legacy to word, and in the 'find' field, inserted the 'tab character' from the 'special' area.

Re: [LegacyUG] preferred line

2008-03-01 Thread Hope Bagot Bees
Ron Yes, I did realise there was a difference. Some weeks ago when this subject was last aired, I decided to indicate 'preferred' children generally - but can't remember how -and the stars appeared (I'm sure they weren't there before). I have always used Direct Line emboldening from one of

Re: [LegacyUG] preferred line

2008-03-01 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
Elizabeth - go to Options Customize Data Format and uncheck the box for Indicate Preferred Children Elizabeth researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: Hope Bagot Bees [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com

RE: [LegacyUG] Postings

2008-03-01 Thread Jim Terry/Support
Christina, Sometimes people new to the Legacy User Group (LUG) send their messages to the wrong e-mail address. The correct e-mail address for LUG messages is [EMAIL PROTECTED] Messages incorrectly sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED] will not reach other LUG subscribers, as this address is used solely

Re: [LegacyUG] preferred line

2008-03-01 Thread RICHARD SCHULTHIES
Since I didn't know, I didn't answer, hoping someone else did. Sorry. Rich in LA CA --- Hope Bagot Bees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A week or so back the subject of 'preferred' line was discussed. I've looked back in the archives but can't find an answer to the problem I now have. My direct

[LegacyUG] Preferred Line

2008-03-01 Thread Hope Bagot Bees
To Rich in LA - if I sent the enquiry to you directly, it was meant to go to the group - sorry. Elizabeth Richardson has answered it. Thank you Elizabeth H Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages:

[LegacyUG] Alternate Names

2008-03-01 Thread Richard Van Wasshnova
When adding alternate names, as for a woman's married name should we copy the Given Name also? If a woman uses Elizabeth or Isabelle as Given, Petit or Petee as Maiden and Garnier or Grenier as Married Name that's 8 possible combinations. I have been doing 2 Given (only) and 4 Surnames

Re: [LegacyUG] Indentation

2008-03-01 Thread Carl Cox
I copied the note in Legacy to word, and in the 'find' field, inserted the 'tab character' from the 'special' area. Then in the 'replace' field, entered 12 spaces and hit the 'replace all' - voila! the tabs were replaced with spaces. Note that HTML coding treats any number of spaces as just

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names

2008-03-01 Thread Susan Daily
Richard, I will answer just the first question. When you do alternate names, check out how the reports handle them. For example, if you just use the last name, one Legacy report will say, Anna was also known as Smith. And that wouldn't probably be what you would want to see. Also, in the name list

RE: [LegacyUG] A Census Question - Topekan

2008-03-01 Thread Mary Figgins
What a small world! [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mary Figgins - Another Topekan here. Bob Mary Figgins wrote: = I agree. My citations for censuses are actually Household of Jesse Root. 1920 Kansas, Shawnee County, Topeka, Ward 4, ED 53, page 61. I figure anyone should be

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names

2008-03-01 Thread Wendy Howard
Hi Richard, If a woman uses Elizabeth or Isabelle as Given, Petit or Petee as Maiden and Garnier or Grenier as Married Name that's 8 possible combinations. If you were to enter all possible combinations, regardless of whether you'd found them in use or not, you could have a lot of names

RE: [LegacyUG] Problem connecting to Legacy Home.

2008-03-01 Thread Jan Roberts
If I click on the Legacy News link (i.e. the actual words Legacy News) I am taken to the Legacy News page. However, if I click on the 'Make sure you are connected to the internet and then click here to retrieve the latest news items' link nothing happens. If I click on the Options Button (i.e.

Re: [LegacyUG] Problem connecting to Legacy Home.

2008-03-01 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
If you have a way that works to access what you want to see, why are you trying another way? Elizabeth researching the descendants of William and Sarah (Patterson) Thompson - Original Message - From: Jan Roberts [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent:

Re: [LegacyUG] Alternate Names

2008-03-01 Thread Richard Van Wasshnova
Thank you Susan and Wendy for the helpful suggestions regarding my first question. I think I will add married names to women married after about 1850. In earlier times under French-Canadian and German customs women kept their maiden names. Would a Mrs prefix be appropriate with married names?

Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

2008-03-01 Thread Gary Templeman
- Original Message - From: Maureen Chambers [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Friday, February 29, 2008 4:11 AM Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources Elizabeth wrote: ...I'll now sit back and wait for the backlash . . . . ! No

[LegacyUG] Printing references on next page

2008-03-01 Thread Valerie Garton
Has this problem been resolved yet. This problem occurred when I upgraded to .168 so I have not been game to do any more upgrades as I do not want any more problems. Regards from Valerie in sunny Sydney. Researching: BEDDY, CULLODEN, DYAS and ROWAN in Belfast, Dublin, Wicklow Wexford Guild of

Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

2008-03-01 Thread Maureen Chambers
Gary wrote: ..Forcing that researcher to spend time and money obtain their own copy of every document I have located over decades of searching does nothing to extend the lines. Gary I agree with all you have said. I should have mentioned that I was not into pure genealogy - just the

Re: [LegacyUG] Search problem More on Sources

2008-03-01 Thread Elizabeth Richardson
From: Maureen Chambers Also I think we are truly selling our descendants rather short by underestimating their ability to pick up where we have left off. If we are managing, I'm sure they will be more than capable of doing so, especially with the advances in electronic technology. As a

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing references on next page

2008-03-01 Thread Gary Templeman
No software is bug free, and these kind of build updates are intended to fix problems as they are discovered. Yes, occasionally a new problem is created, but in general there are many more fixes than new problems, and when a problem is created it is usually fixed in a subsequent update. So