Pat,
I am not saying that the RC does not have a problem, although I have never
found it, but are you certain that you have ghost marriages, or similar?
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
GOONS #5307
Pat Hickin pph...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Listers,
I probably shouldn’t be spending my time
My last should have said, of course, do not have ghost images
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
GOONS #5307
Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Pat,
I am not saying that the RC does not have a problem, although I have never
found it, but are you certain that you have ghost
My dad and my stepmother are blood related (distantly but blood related). They
relationship calculator will only say that they are husband and wife.
Michele
From: Pat Hickin [mailto:pph...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2012 11:51 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject:
Michele,
Are you limiting the RC by setting the number of levels in the bottom
left of its screen too low?
Jacob
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 7:20 AM, Michele Lewis ancestor...@gmail.com wrote:
My dad and my stepmother are blood related (distantly but blood related).
They relationship calculator
Well that's weird. I didn't change the settings at all. I had blood at 999
and non blood at 10 already. Now it is showing them as 4th cousins twice
removed and as husband and wife. I have only recently connected my stepmother
into the family but the first time I ran it, it didn't pick it up
Ron,
What is a ghost marriage?
Michele, I think the RC must be like people -- exercise makes them more
agile! :-)
Pat
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Michele Lewis ancestor...@gmail.comwrote:
Well that's weird. I didn't change the settings at all. I had blood at
999 and non blood at 10
I don't use SourceWriter for censuses.
I'm very much a splitter. My Source List Name reads, e.g.:
Year US State County - township/PO - repository (HeritageQuest, Anc or
whatever)
1860 US Census-IL-Jackson Co.-Carbondale PO-HerQu
For the Title, I simply copy and paste the Source List Name.
On 9/11/2012 7:58 AM, Pat Hickin wrote:
Year US State County - township/PO - repository (HeritageQuest, Anc
or whatever)
Repository is not (HeritageQuest, Ancestry or whatever)
U.S. Census are housed at the 'National Archives'. If HeritageQuest,
Ancestry are no longer around, how would one
Tim,
I do not not disagree with you in absolute terms, but I do put (Ancestry,
Findmypast etc.) in the repository. But I also make it clear where the
actual documents may be viewed. My reason for this is that there may by a
transcription error in Ancestry etc. which I have recorded as written;
The first step of the Genealogical Proof Standard is to complete a
reasonably exhaustive search for all relevant records related to your
research objective. This webinar, presented by Certified Genealogist
Michael Hait, discusses what a reasonably exhaustive search constitutes,
why this is
I file my papers by family (I believe it's the system by Mills?), and have a
question for those of you who do likewise. I don't wish to change how I file
the papers, because I do my research by family.
For a daughter, I have been filing all her papers for events prior to her
marriage (e.g., her
On 11/09/2012 17:09, Ron Ferguson wrote:
I do not not disagree with you in absolute terms, but I do put (Ancestry,
Findmypast etc.) in the repository. But I also make it clear where the
actual documents may be viewed. My reason for this is that there may by a
transcription error in Ancestry
Jenny,
There is no difference between us. I was thinking mainly in terms of
transcribed data, but like yourself, if there is an image then, I agree, it is
my view which I use; often with a comment such as Ancestry indexes the name
as x , where it differs from my version.
I still put the
For a daughter--yes
For a son--I would follow same as for a daughter as you listed
but remember everyone has a different way of filing and depends on the how you
are developing the tree therefore there isn't a correct way of filing. You do
what is comfortable to you...if you have Legacy use it
Although I file by MRIN, the question is still applicable.
I put all records for a person in their MRIN folder (and under their
MRIN in paper filing) regardless of whether it's before a marriage or
after. Except, for instance, where they're in a census record as a
child. All census records are
Sorry, I've tried, but I don't know how to accomplish this. I don't have a
problem highlighting the text, then doing a copy/paste,
but I don't know how do I get the source to copy? Thanks...
Lavern Hall
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 8:00 PM, JLB j...@jgen.ws wrote:
If your previous use of that
Hi again,
I'm using version 5 Deluxe.
And I still think it is the best of the best.
And I've been using genealogy software since
Roots II and CP/M in the mid 1980s.
But.
Here is what is happening with Legacy.
1. Henry Kirk is born in 1917 and I enter him into Legacy.
2. When I save, I'm asked
There is something in the options you can change. It asks you if they are
living or dead based on what age you have in this option. You can pump the age
up to something like 999 and then it won't ask you anymore.
Michele
-Original Message-
From: Karen and Jim
If it's an Event you're talking about and I think from what you said, it
is, click the Edit button for that Event on a person where it's entered
correctly. Over on the right side, under the bigger buttons - under Help
are two smaller buttons, one for copy, one for paste. Click the copy
button
Repository is not (HeritageQuest, Ancestry or whatever)
U.S. Census are housed at the 'National Archives'. If HeritageQuest, Ancestry
are no longer around, how would one find the record. One needs to enter where
and how to drive a person to the actual source.
Ancestry, are just tools to make
On 11/09/2012 20:48, Lavern Hall wrote:
Sorry, I've tried, but I don't know how to accomplish this. I don't have a
problem highlighting the text, then doing a copy/paste,
but I don't know how do I get the source to copy? Thanks...
You don't usually use Copy Paste to replicate and Event and
I put all of the records for an individual together. (I use 3-ring binders, but
I have described it as if the dividers were folders.) If I don't have any
descendants for the person, I put their records with their parents. If I later
find descendants, I move the records. I keep the photos in
Thanks.
The procedure JL outlined is correct for copying the event;
however, as Jenny confirmed, the source does not copy.
I suspect the easiest (and quickest) option is to just
re-create the source for this child, but I'm happy to read
up on Events and the Source Clipboard again... always
Sherry,
I'm assume that Legacy is using Windoz
Print Preview for the report screen display.
And I find no fault in that. In fact it is a plus
in that Legacy doesn't need to add
it to its own large code baggage.
I see I have Microsoft XPS Document Writer
installed in Printers and Faxes. Nothing
The 1891 census shows Bertie Knight as a 4-year-old daughter. I added
her as such. Then she appeared in 1901 as a 14-year-old son, working as
a hay binder. In 1911, she is also a son and still working as a hay binder.
It seems reasonably obvious that he was mislabelled in 1891, so I
clicked
Tony
I would suggest putting your findings in the Notes for the individual.
You may also put in an Alt Birth using the same birth information but adding
a note that the 1891 Census contains an error on gender and sourcing it with
the 1901 and 1911 Censuses.
If you also use new.FamilySearch verify
Jim,
I am right in thinking that you are still using V5. If so do you really expect
Legacy to amend such an outdated version?
This does not mean I agree with your comments, I don't.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
GOONS #5307
J
Karen and Jim sindbe...@att.net wrote:
Sherry,
I'm assume
27 matches
Mail list logo
