On 06/02/2014 23:40, Gene Young wrote:
Boilerplate refers to text that you use often or repeatedly.
Yes, I understand the term.
However, I must be being a bit dense, I think because ...
In
Legacy it is even faster to use the function keys to do this as you
are not switching between
Same result.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 6:39 PM, C.G. Ouimet c.g.oui...@outlook.com wrote:
I hadn't run this report for a while so I looked at it again only to get
Runtime Error 3265. Item not found in this collection followed by a
Legacy 800-397 shutdown. I tried it with 24, 16, 12, 6 and 3
Re: Also, your original post did imply that the Windows shortcut keys for Copy
and Paste required you to be copying from another application.
Windows short-cut keys work within and between applications ... i.e. everywhere
...
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston ON
-Original Message-
From: Jenny M
@Pam
Like Leon I use Parallels in combination with WIN7 and never have had
any problems.
I put Legacy on one side of the screen and on the other whatever
software I need to, like Safari browser or documents. I use Legacy 8.
Leon Chapman wrote:
Pam:
I use Parallels and have Windows 7 8
My problem too, it takes minutes and sometimes longer before the
information is loaded.
Or the LFS gets stuck and I need to do a forced close, by ctrl-alt del
It is not FS server, which I believed it was before, it is all the time.
It did work very good in the beginning and I miss it. Work on an
Karen,
Please do not use colored backgrounds with your emails. It is very
harsh on the eyes.
Thank you,
Ron Bernier
Woonsocket, RI
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 7, 2014, at 6:18 AM, SHTAIM sht...@gmail.com wrote:
My problem too, it takes minutes and sometimes longer before the information
is
I entered a problem report on this issue of the F9, 11 and 12 keys. The
programmer has reported it fixed but there will be a necessary change.
With the new Legacy interface he was not able to use Shift-Fn so he has
made then function work with CTRL-Fn. He says he has updated the help
files in all
Jenny M Benson wrote:
On 06/02/2014 15:49, MikeFry wrote:
On 06 Feb 2014 16:12, Jenny M Benson wrote:
Where does the text come from that you are copying and pasting with the
F keys, then?
Help file - search for 'Memorizing Fields'.
Well, you live and learn! Thanks for that, Mike. I will
Isn't there a separate email user group for creating websites with Legacy?
If so, I can't seem to find it.
Pat
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
It is still available in L8.
___
Leon Chapman
chap...@gmail.com
-
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 7:02 AM, Dale McIntyre dcmc1...@gmail.com wrote:
I use the Geo-database from Legacy version 6.0.0.118. If I upgrade to
Legacy 8, does the Geo-Database change?
Dale McIntyre
Legacy User Group
On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Pat Hickin pph...@gmail.com wrote:
Isn't there a separate email user group for creating websites with Legacy?
If so, I can't seem to find it.
Pat
https://uk.groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/WUL/info
Legacy User Group guidelines:
On 07 Feb 2014 17:23, singhals wrote:
Using the f-keys perhaps eliminates the need to hi-light
what one wants copied? In Another Program, I could hit f-8
and copy into this NOTES whatever I had last saved in
some-other NOTES. That was lots easier than hi-lite, ctl-c,
page over, ctl-v.
The
I use the Geo-database from Legacy version 6.0.0.118. If I upgrade to
Legacy 8, does the Geo-Database change?
Dale McIntyre
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
MikeFry wrote:
On 07 Feb 2014 17:23, singhals wrote:
Using the f-keys perhaps eliminates the need to hi-light
what one wants copied? In Another Program, I could hit f-8
and copy into this NOTES whatever I had last saved in
some-other NOTES. That was lots easier than hi-lite, ctl-c,
page
On 07 Feb 2014 19:19, singhals wrote:
True, but in that it's no worse than the clipboard.
Whatever floats your boat that day. IMO, it's frequently
easier to mark/dele than to bounce from pillar to post doing
ctl-c/ctl-v.
And then... there's the mouse. You can always mark with the mouse and
MikeFry wrote:
On 07 Feb 2014 19:19, singhals wrote:
True, but in that it's no worse than the clipboard.
Whatever floats your boat that day. IMO, it's frequently
easier to mark/dele than to bounce from pillar to post doing
ctl-c/ctl-v.
And then... there's the mouse. You can always mark
Error 3265 error has been reported in our problem reporting system.
This was not found by our testers because the Beta test version did not
experience this error. Our Beta test version is like the Deluxe. The
code for some special testing features is in the program but it is only
activated when
I'm using build 385; I've been getting annoying popup
notices that this birthdate or that is not proven. It
took me two days to figure out it was referring to the fact
that I had entered no specific source rather than to the
notion that I had entered not proven somewhere.
Is there a way to turn
Version 8.0.0.397
Individual died: Jun Q 1924
buried: 16 Jun 1924
PP text: Burial too late after death.
'Jun Q' as an accepted date, covers the period 1st April through 30th June.
Period set at the default 30 days after death. The burial date is within this
period, therefore it
When I know the burial date but not the death date, I set the date date to Abt
the burial date like ...
Died: Abt 1765-1-25
Buried: 1765-1-25
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston ON
-Original Message-
From: MikeFry [mailto:emjay...@gmail.com]
Sent: February 07, 2014 05:16 PM
To:
On 08 Feb 2014 00:34, C.G. Ouimet wrote:
When I know the burial date but not the death date, I set the date date to
Abt the burial date like ...
Died: Abt 1765-1-25
Buried: 1765-1-25
Not the point :-) There is a problem (probably more) when using the GRO quarter
dates.
--
Regards,
Mike
hi
I keep getting a problem list on one child. She was born 1975 her parents
divorced.
Her adopted father adopted her as an adult 2013 for estate reasons. The problem
list
tells me The Person was born before the marriage of his/her parents. HOW do
I correct this?
I have entered mark as not a
I understand the bug but why a 2nd Qtr death when the burial is known as Jun 16?
C.G. Ouimet
Kingston ON
-Original Message-
From: MikeFry [mailto:emjay...@gmail.com]
Sent: February 07, 2014 05:38 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Another Potential Problem
You could use the split screen function and then you could have both showing
at the same time.
-Original Message-
From: singhals
Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 2:40 PM
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Installed Version: 8.0.0.397
MikeFry wrote:
On 07 Feb 2014
Mike, thankfully I needn't work with any of the GRO quarterly dates. It may
indeed be a bug with the PP algorithm not coping with a Q date. But then
again, does not your Jun Q date technically include April 1st as a possible
death date? If the period is set to the default of 30 days after
Individual died: Jun Q 1924
buried: 16 Jun 1924
Showing the death as Jun Q 1924 would be quite acceptable if this is the
information shown on the available death record. I tend to use abt 16 Jun 1924
as it should be a closer indicator of the actual date - as burials generally
take
I am using 8.0.0.397 in windows 7. In preparation for a Legacy Users Group
meeting, I set option 1.1 to FamilySearch View and saved it. When I opened my
family file it opened in the Research view. Does anyone else see this
happening? I don't want to use this setting but did want to demonstrate
On 08 Feb 2014 03:19, Brian L. Lightfoot wrote:
Mike, thankfully I needn't work with any of the GRO quarterly dates. It may
indeed be a bug with the PP algorithm not coping with a Q date. But then
again, does not your Jun Q date technically include April 1st as a possible
death date? If the
On 08 Feb 2014 04:55, Bobby Johnson wrote:
I am using 8.0.0.397 in windows 7. In preparation for a Legacy Users Group
meeting, I set option 1.1 to FamilySearch View and saved it. When I opened
my family file it opened in the Research view. Does anyone else see this
happening? I don't want
29 matches
Mail list logo
