Before v. 10, I believe, if a person never married, the individual's view
could be set to state Never married. Now it says No relationships. Is
it possible for me to somehow customize this wording, going back to the
orginal version as the default, but using the new wording when appropirate?
The recording of today's webinar, Discovering Your Kentucky Ancestors by
Mark Lowe PLUS the after-webinar party is now available to view for free at
www.FamilyTreeWebinars.com http://www.familytreewebinars.com/ for a
limited time.
Mark Lowe will teach you about:
- Learn about the records that
Just how the heck can you determine that an individual had no relationships?
Most people today have many, many relationships over the course of a lifetime,
and some even have many simultaneously!
Of course, not all of them are long-term relationships. I suppose someone
brilliant decided
*SUGGESTION:*
Please consider making the wording for no relationships and had no children
adjustable by the user as well as selectable for each individual.
Thank you!
Gene Wheeler
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:09 PM, Brian/Support br...@legacyfamilytree.com
wrote:
The wording for no
I think the intent was something other than what you have in mind.
Gene
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 8:15 PM, CE WOOD wood...@msn.com wrote:
Just how the heck can you determine that an individual had no
relationships? Most people today have many, many relationships over the
course of a lifetime,
I agree, but that is not the point.
The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
Forethought is important.
CE
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:37:06 -0500
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
From: bridge...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
I think the intent was something
Please submit your suggestion to support; it will not be logged from here.
CE
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2015 20:14:38 -0500
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Customize wording?
From: bridge...@gmail.com
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com
SUGGESTION:
Please consider making the wording for no relationships and
Good Day Brian,
Thanks for the response. I've waited, yet it seems your response is all that is
coming.
You wrote: 'I think she answered your question in the first paragraph by
saying With the same number of pictures in a smaller size (lower resolution),
the Media Gallery opened a lot
How to correct wrong Lat/Lon from a location (when it is in USA instead of New
Zealand)
I deleted the entry with the intention of re-entering a corrected location but
found the
person has been deleted from the family, which is disconcerting. The edit
facility does
not seem to cover Lat/Lon.
Is
Charles,
The easiest way is to go to the Master Location list as Brian says and
then highlight the problem location (if you access the Master List from
the arrow at the end of the location field in the Individual View, it
will already be highlighted)
then click the Geo-code button above the People
Version 10??? Wait a minute…did Millennia pull a Microsoft trick and jump from
version 8 to version 10? Was I sleeping and missed this? Will Donald Trump
really be the Republican nominee?
Brian in CA
From: Gene Wheeler [mailto:bridge...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2015 2:35 PM
I understand your concern in looking for a specific documentation about the use
of lower resolutions in the Picture Center and all I can say is that you can
look forever -- you just ain't gonna find it. It's sort of similar to trying to
find written documentation about which restaurant serves
I think she answered your question in the first paragraph by saying With the
same number of pictures in a smaller size (lower resolution), the Media Gallery
opened a lot quicker.
While that may not be a recommendation that is written in any Legacy
documentation, it none the less is a
'Never married' is definitely not the same as 'no relationships' and I am at a
loss as to how anyone at Legacy can think it is. If it was changed for
political correctness which I suspect, surely 'no legalised relationship' would
be better but I suppose that might intimate other relationships
As far as I can see if you enter a spouse against an individual - and
note that they did not marry - that is when the term had a relationship
with now appears, which to me makes sense in the wording. You can add as
many partners against a person and if you note they did not marry the
wording comes
15 matches
Mail list logo
