Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread Ed Ladendorf via LegacyUserGroup
+0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries Thank you very much for the replies. Although this was a gut feeling that they were the same person, I did not throw out the possibility that they were actually 2 different people. I know things much stranger than this will be found in ge

Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread Linda Greethurst
. > > > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Ed Ladendorf <edladend...@yahoo.com> > To: Legacy User Group <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com> > Cc: > Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2016 23:58:10 + (UTC) > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries > Thank you very much

Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread Ed Ladendorf via LegacyUserGroup
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known

Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread Pat Hickin
Yes, what Jenny says is true -- if you don't list them as two separate people I'd certainly add that possibility in the notes. Pat On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 3:14 PM, Jenny M Benson wrote: > On 12/04/2016 19:29, Ed Ladendorf wrote: > > Although I have to question the

Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread Pat Hickin
12, 2016 2:32 PM > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com > Cc: Ed Ladendorf > Subject: [LegacyUG] Question on entries > > > You stated: > Although I have to question the source, I do have sources from > familysearch.org for siblings, one of which is almost certainly a direct > anc

Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 12/04/2016 19:29, Ed Ladendorf wrote: Although I have to question the source, I do have sources from familysearch.org for siblings, one of which is almost certainly a direct ancestor of mine. Here's the problem: These

Re: [LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread R G Strong-genes
Subject: [LegacyUG] Question on entries You stated: Although I have to question the source, I do have sources from familysearch.org for siblings, one of which is almost certainly a direct ancestor of mine. Here's the problem: These are from the same parents - one name listed is Petri Schommer

[LegacyUG] Question on entries

2016-04-12 Thread Ed Ladendorf via LegacyUserGroup
The original message to the list is in the attachment. This action is required because of the DMARC Reject/Quarantine Policy imposed by some email providers. Users who want to send messages without conversion to attachments should use a different email address for their subscription. Known