Thanks Brian
On 11 August 2016 at 08:05, Brian/Support
wrote:
> You have found a previously unreported problem with the program, as you
> reported when you include married names in the search results Legacy
> reverts to the last search results not the results from
You have found a previously unreported problem with the program, as you
reported when you include married names in the search results Legacy
reverts to the last search results not the results from the statistics
report search list. If you turn off the married name your statistics
lists will
try clicking on the Reset on the right hand side
> of the screen and try the report again.
> Russ
>
> *From:* John Groome <johnjgro...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:51 PM
> *To:* Legacy User Group <legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com>
> *Subject:* [LegacyUG]
John,
When you open the report try clicking on the Reset on the right hand side of
the screen and try the report again.
Russ
From: John Groome
Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 12:51 PM
To: Legacy User Group
Subject: [LegacyUG] Statistics Report
I find the statistic report especially helpful
I find the statistic report especially helpful to find individuals with missing
birth dates.
When I run the report I can see immediately the count of “individuals with
insufficient date information” from which I can produce a search list and
investigate any issues.
After the list has been
The new Ver 8 has a great Statistics report.
But one area has me questioning the calculation methods used.
For Average Lifespan here are my figures;
Avg lifespan between 1600-1699 83 years, 4 months, 21 days
Avg lifespan between 1700-1799 78 Years, 6 Months, 26 days
Avg lifespan
] Statistics Report
The new Ver 8 has a great Statistics report.
But one area has me questioning the calculation methods used.
For Average Lifespan here are my figures;
Avg lifespan between 1600-1699 83 years, 4 months, 21 days
Avg lifespan between 1700-1799 78 Years, 6 Months, 26 days
I know nothing about how the calculations are made, but I do wonder if
perhaps you know of more short-lived babies in the 20th century than in
previous ones? That would affect the statistics.
I know that here in New Zealand the government records have made it
easier to discover stillbirths and
On 1 December 2013 13:08, Wendy Howard wendy.how...@gmail.com wrote:
The one that tickles my
fancy though - and clearly I've got a mistake in my data somewhere! - is
a 20th century marriage that has lasted 873 (and a half) years!
Eeep!!! do let us know what the typo was when you find it
I found it pretty quickly - when I went back to the statistics report, I
must have accidentally clicked on the longest marriage in the options,
and it showed the name and other details below the box of statistics
options. I'd mistyped a death year as 1079 instead of 1979.
Now my longest marriage
What a neat report. My longest marriage was 1046 years; a 1699 year
old; and a 1688 year old.
Gotta watch those typos :)
Bernie
On 30/11/2013 8:54 PM, Wendy Howard wrote:
I found it pretty quickly - when I went back to the statistics report, I
must have accidentally clicked on the longest
11 matches
Mail list logo