Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-05 Thread Mike Fry
On 04 Jun 2014 00:53, Cathy Pinner wrote: If you have the Deluxe version, you can use the Tool - Advanced Set Living. This takes in more parameters than the automatic change to dead on save. It should mark your couple married in the 1700s dead. The Advanced Set Living tool is one of those to

Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-05 Thread Cathy Pinner
Saves one set of hassles and introduces another ;-) So long as you can remember to mark the living, living, that's fine. For me it is too big a privacy risk to have people automatically set to deceased when added. The Legacy 7 Advanced Set Living Tool was as effective as the Legacy 8 one. I

Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-04 Thread R G Strong-genes
the same question as in the Customize 2.3 that I referred to previously. -Original Message- From: Cathy Pinner Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 6:53 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers If you have the Deluxe version, you can use the Tool - Advanced

Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-04 Thread singhals
you Apply to the Set as dead if over ? field. -Original Message- From: singhals Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:50 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] not living triggers Since the program asked me for parameters with the marriage date with it could assume

Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-04 Thread Eliz Hanebury
To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] not living triggers Since the program asked me for parameters with the marriage date with it could assume living, I /assumed/ that if the marriage occurred in the 1700s, the program would use that instead of a death date to mark the couple not-living

[LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-03 Thread singhals
Since the program asked me for parameters with the marriage date with it could assume living, I /assumed/ that if the marriage occurred in the 1700s, the program would use that instead of a death date to mark the couple not-living. It doesn't seem to. So, Should it be? If not, then why'd it

Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-03 Thread R G Strong-genes
Cheryl, There must be a date in the birth field for it to assume that they are dead. No date no calculation can be performed. -Original Message- From: singhals Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:50 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] not living triggers Since

Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-03 Thread R G Strong-genes
on entry or when you Apply to the Set as dead if over ? field. -Original Message- From: singhals Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:50 PM To: legacyusergroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] not living triggers Since the program asked me for parameters with the marriage date with it could

Re: [LegacyUG] not living triggers

2014-06-03 Thread Cathy Pinner
@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] not living triggers Since the program asked me for parameters with the marriage date with it could assume living, I /assumed/ that if the marriage occurred in the 1700s, the program would use that instead of a death date to mark the couple not-living. It doesn't