On 2012/04/02 00:17, Kirstin wrote:
I don't know if anyone answered you, but I find the same thing. Just
figured it was a bug not worth worrying about.
On 10/20/2011 9:23 PM, ChuckH44 . wrote:
I have a question about data entry in the Individual's Information
window and wondering if
Ditto what Mike said. Sometimes a fresh install fixes things that are not
detected by others. Version 180 seems to be pretty stable. Should the
problems persist after an upgrade, please post back again so someone can help.
Ron Taylor
--- On Mon, 4/2/12, Mike Fry mike...@iafrica.com wrote:
On 2012/04/02 15:15, Robert E. Carneal wrote:
*Suppose I have a relative living, and I put down her home address and home
phone number. Can I mark just the address and phone number in some way to
prevent their being printed in reports? Birthday, location (such as Miami,
Florida) are fine,
Brian, I have been through this process myself. Tedious, but it works. I
suspect it would be hard to code, especially in a fashion that is pleasing to
everyone. ;)
--Paula in Texas
Researching: Adair Baker Beasley Benson Betz Bigley Blagrave Burton Chapman
Clement Clough Coppernoll Costine
Mike,
I am unsure about this. Doesn't your response imply that the default for
*all* living individuals will be to publish the details? As far as I know it
is not possible to over-ride the hide details for the living just for a
specified individual.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
I’m running version .180 and I’m seeing this problem also.
George
From: Kirstin
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2012 5:17 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
Cc: ChuckH44 .
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Legacy Individual's Information Window Issue
I don't know if anyone answered you, but I find the same
I have tested and I cannot duplicate this problem with my system. I have
Windows 7 64 Bit. What are the systems you folks with the problem have.
Answer the following:
Windows version
Legacy install location
Are you running from a system administrator account in windows
Where is your data file
Brian,
I’m running windows 7 64 bit with latest updates
Legacy installed in default location C:\Legacy
Running as administrator as I’m the only user on system
Data file in C:\Legacy\Data
I added a son to a couple with birth date and death date and immediately
clicked the + to add burial info and
I also just tested this and had no problem.
Version .180
Opened Sample db.
Added new son to couple. (right clicked on father)
Entered birth dt place, death dt place, burial dt place for son. (it did
prompt me is this correct? on each location)
Clicked on + next to burial and was able to add
Here's the status on the 1940 U.S. Federal Census at
Ancestry.com as of 5 p.m. EST.
_Completed_
American Samoa
Delaware
District of Columbia
Guam
Indiana
Maine
Nevada
Panama Canal Zone
Virgin Islands
_In Process_
California
New York
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
Virginia
If you log on to the
It figures that the deep south would be the bottom of the heap. Interesting
that the opted to put the American Territories at the top of the list
Michele
-Original Message-
From: hwedhlor [mailto:hwedh...@cox.net]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:04 PM
To:
I wish to develop a list of all those direct ancestors and their children
who have any event located in Kentucky. I have wrestled with search,
with report definitions, with the Location Master List, but for the life
of me I can't see my way clear to do such a list. Actually what I need is
Family
They are small and easy to complete - my opinion.
Waiting for Illinois, myself! ;)
--Paula
From: Michele Lewis ancestor...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Mon, April 2, 2012 4:11:46 PM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] 1940 Census status - slightly
Greetings:
I am using Legacy Ver. 7.5.0.180.
While playing with the Census List feature, on the 'Create a List of Potential
Individuals' page, I select Canada, 1901 Census. People that I expect to see
on the list are not there. I have found the names in the actual Census.
The 'Report
I can see getting the list of everyone using a set of locations (all in
Kentucky) but I can't see then printing the FGR's for all those people... not
automatically. I can't even see how to tag those people.
Do you already know how to get the list of people? or do you need steps for
that.
Michelle,
Respectfully, it really doesn't matter what order they would have chosen to
post the data. There is bound to be those who complain that the order isn't
favorable to them. People are just never happy.
Ron Bernier
Woonsocket, RI
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 2, 2012, at 5:12 PM, Michele
I plan to make a trip to Frankfort Kentucky to research those of my
families that have any event taking place in Kentucky. I just thought a
family group sheet would be the best set of information to take along to
work from. I guess if I could get a list of those people having any event
in Kentucky
Smallest population, smallest census. Between the deep south and the northwest
we may have to wait until next year for our 1940 census.
Constance
-Original Message-
From: Michele Lewis [mailto:ancestor...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 2:12 PM
To:
I am also not able to duplicate the problem either and I haven't updated to the
.180 yet.
I am using Windows 7, Legacy is on my C drive and I'm the administrator, data
files go to Legacy data folder in my documents.
Constance
-Original Message-
From: Brian/Support
Yes, I have had this situation for some time too. It is not constant
problem - perhaps every 20 records or so - I haven't kept track. Been
happening for a couple of years.
Lina
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 2:06 PM, George/Kathy geoda...@mwt.net wrote:
I’m running version .180 and I’m seeing this
I was just KIDDING! Good grief!
Michele
-Original Message-
From: Ronald Bernier [mailto:ronaldbern...@bernfrin.org]
Sent: Monday, April 02, 2012 5:36 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 1940 Census status - slightly off-topic
Michelle,
Respectfully, it
Do remember Ancestry isn't the only horse in this race. I just got done
indexing five pages for FamilySearch's efforts and I know there are
several others out there. *s*
On 4/2/2012 7:37 PM, Michele Lewis wrote:
I was just KIDDING! Good grief!
Michele
-Original Message-
From:
There was one, Delaware (okay it might be that I saw *G*) when I
started this after noon,and that was after I did some Ohio Marriages
and there were none, and now a couple of hours later they have 5
ready to index G
Eliz
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Jackie King jskin...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's what I did:
Go into Location List and Sort right to left, so all the Kentucky locations are
together.
Tag each Kentucky location. (Untag other locations.)
Close Location List.
Go into Reports - All Reports - Books and Other.
Select Location report:
Locations to print - only tagged
Excellent - I tried to download a batch this a.m. and couldn't get one.
--Paula
From: Jackie King jskin...@gmail.com
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Sent: Mon, April 2, 2012 7:50:36 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] 1940 Census status - slightly off-topic
Do
While it is always hard to tell, it appears that Delaware may be close
to being indexed. I see Colorado is their priority state now. It
always takes a bit for them to get up what has been indexed but this
appears to be going faster than normal. I did five pages tonight and
within two hours two of
Are SOME people making everything political now? Jeez!
On 4/2/2012 2:11 PM, Michele Lewis wrote:
It figures that the deep south would be the bottom of the heap. Interesting
that the opted to put the American Territories at the top of the list
Michele
-Original Message-
From:
27 matches
Mail list logo
