Re: [LegacyUG] Gedcom Exporting Settings are not remember next time used?

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
John, These are the Legacy defaults, so ,no, they cannot be permanently changed. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: John Magyari Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:51 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Gedcom Exporting Settings are not

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
John, By all means use the American four field standard for American locations, but for other countries use their own formats, normally the way in which they are written. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ From: John Magyari Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2012 7:35 PM To:

Re: [LegacyUG] Census List - Rush To Publish

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Mike, Trusting that you mean New South Wales, Australia, I can see that being a bit of a problem. I can only suggest that for the latter Australia is added in the name field. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Mike Fry Sent: Friday, March 09, 2012 1:00 PM To:

Re: [LegacyUG] probate index

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 04:22, Tony Rolfe wrote: I'm not sure how to record this (or indeed, whether to bother), and am looking for advice. The UK Index of wills and probate says something like Fred Smith of {address} died on {date}, probate {date} to George Smith and Mary Jones, effects {amount}

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread John Magyari
Thanks for everyone's ideas. Some of my Polish time periods use 4 some 5 positions I decided to force all 5 location positions into 4. Having same number of fields helps with sorting. Ideally if would be nice to specify Number of locations field MAX. Then if entered with less fields specify

Re: [LegacyUG] Census List - Rush To Publish

2012-03-11 Thread Mike Fry
On 2012/03/11 13:13, Ron Ferguson wrote: Trusting that you mean New South Wales, Australia, I can see that being a bit of a problem. I can only suggest that for the latter Australia is added in the name field. Why? Wales is a country! It also doesn't work for Channel Islands! If countries

RE: [LegacyUG] probate index

2012-03-11 Thread Michele Lewis
Do you know what the relationship is between Fred Smith and George Smith and Mary Jones? If so, I would be using the index as a source to record AKAs for their names and to document that they were still alive at the time of the event. I would mention that they were the executors of the will

RE: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Michele Lewis
Not only should identical sources not repeat [when they are back to back] but once you used a short source [subsequent citation] it should continue to use that short citation even if the details are slightly different. The classic example is a book. 1st citation [no italics because I am using

RE: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Alan Pereira
Michele, I have done indexing for FreeCEN which is a completely separate index to that in Ancestry on UK censuses. The approach by both appears to be different as well, which would lead me to thinking that FamilySearch will have a different index to Ancestry. Alan -Original Message-

RE: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Michele Lewis
I will say that when FamilySearch indexed the 1930, they used the Ancestry index as Indexer A (you have TWO people index each record and then an arbitrator intervenes if there is a difference between the two) so they have collaborated before. michele -Original Message- From: Alan

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 12:07, John Magyari wrote: Thanks for everyone's ideas. Some of my Polish time periods use 4 some 5 positions I decided to force all 5 location positions into 4. Having same number of fields helps with sorting. Ideally if would be nice to specify Number of locations field

Re: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Tim Rosenlof
https://www.familysearch.org/node/1531 Tim Rosenlof On 3/11/2012 6:06 AM, Michele Lewis wrote: I know FamilySearch will be indexing the 1940 census (I am an indexer) but Ancestry.com will also be indexing. Is this a joint venture between the two or will there be 2 separate indexes? I figure

Re: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Jackie King
You may compare the release issued by familysearch and its two partners to the one put out by Ancestry. It sounds to me like Ancestry is planning its own index - http://corporate.ancestry.com/press/press-releases/2011/08/1940-u.s.-census-to-be-free-on-ancestry.com/ I don't find a more current

Re: [LegacyUG] Prompt to Backup when Closing Legacy

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Or better still, put the Back-up Icon on the tool bar. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ From: R G Strong-genes Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2012 8:18 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Prompt to Backup when Closing Legacy or better yet if you want to make it

Re: [LegacyUG] Family Search: Phooey!

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 14:23, RoadRoy wrote: I should have added that going to familysearch.org http://familysearch.org online tells me NFS is not open to the public yet. If I go to Family Search through Legacy it does not recognize either my old or new user names and passwords. Have you followed

[LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Tim Rosenlof
Hi, Any suggestions for good high quality store for printing 22 x 34 _Legacy Chart_ including pictures and a background.? I just moved to a very small town, however we have a Staples, UPS/Kinkos, or Walmart. I want very high quality gloss because of the pictures. Possibly some printer to have one

Re: [LegacyUG] Census List - Rush To Publish

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
-Original Message- From: Mike Fry Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 12:07 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Census List - Rush To Publish On 2012/03/11 13:13, Ron Ferguson wrote: Trusting that you mean New South Wales, Australia, I can see that being a bit of a

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Robert Runion
I think I misspoke in my earlier message. When looking at the 'View' - 'Master Lists' - 'Source…' - 'edit' - 'Edit Master Source Definition' - and use the same 'name' for the 'Source List Name' and the 'Title', both 'names' will appear in the same numbered end note of a book - which appeared

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jemima, Traditionally ibid worked well with basic sources, however, it is not, and cannot be, applicable to Source Writer Sources, because the latter has a separate statement for the 2nd appearance of a source. I would think that it still works for basic sourcing, although I am open to

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
John, Please see below, From: John Magyari Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 12:07 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields Thanks for everyone's ideas. Some of my Polish time periods use 4 some 5 positions I decided to

Re: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Michele, I do not think so, I understand the findmypast.com are also indexing this census. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Michele Lewis Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 12:06 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] 1940 I know FamilySearch

Re: [LegacyUG] Prompt to Backup when Closing Legacy

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Taylor
That's true Russ but the question was how to get the backup prompt on exit.  It is well known that Legacy sometimes gets error 91 when using the FileBackup but seems to always work with the backup on exit.  Instructions for correcting error 91 do not resolve the problem.  I don't think anyone

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 14:47, Robert Runion wrote: Also, I'm still trying to fathom the significance of a 'File ID' when applied to a Master Source and a 'File ID' as it may relate to a Detail entry. I don't think I have ever seen a need to use both the Master File ID and the Detail ID. As a rule, my

Re: [LegacyUG] Family Search: Phooey!

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 14:53, RoadRoy wrote: A member of the general public may register to be given access to the new FamilySearch program through the registration page. Click here http://www.familysearch.org/invite/public1 to open the registration page. But did you follow the instruction to click

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jenny, Do you think that it might be there for extreme splitters :-)? Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Jenny M Benson Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 3:28 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports On 11/03/2012 14:47,

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Tim, How about Legacy? Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ From: Tim Rosenlof Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 2:39 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Printing Hi, Any suggestions for good high quality store for printing 22 x 34 Legacy Chart including pictures and a

Re: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Maureen Lake
Archives.com and Find My Past have teamed together with FamilySearch to index the 1940 census and to keep it free in perpetuity. FamilySearch has pledged their indexers to have the entire census, all 132+ million people, in six months. They expect to have the first images available to index

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread M. Brenzel
If you sort your location list right to left, they will sort properly, even with different numbers of fields. Mary From: John Magyari [mailto:jmagy...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:08 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in

Re: [LegacyUG] Census List - Rush To Publish

2012-03-11 Thread Mike Fry
On 2012/03/11 16:41, Ron Ferguson wrote: I cannot check the Channel Islands, as I have no records from there. Jersey as a country works! Strange that it's not in the drop-down. The Geo Database has Jersey as a country. Lack of consistency, methinks! -- Regards, Mike Fry Johannesburg Legacy

Re: [LegacyUG] Prompt to Backup when Closing Legacy

2012-03-11 Thread Virginia Dunham
Ron, Thank you...while I had been actively researching...instead of entering the data, I had been saving it...didn't realize that I had not entered any of the data. As per your suggestion, I entered some new information...closed the file and VOILA, the prompt to backup popped up!!! As to the

Re: [LegacyUG] Prompt to Backup when Closing Legacy

2012-03-11 Thread Mike Fry
On 2012/03/11 17:16, Ron Taylor wrote: That's true Russ but the question was how to get the backup prompt on exit. It is well known that Legacy sometimes gets error 91 when using the FileBackup but seems to always work with the backup on exit. Instructions for correcting error 91 do

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Tim Rosenlof
Ron, It is a Legacy report ! I am certainly not going to send it to Millennia. I know their office very well. They don't have the capibility to print large color high quality charts. Tim Rosenlof On 3/11/2012 9:48 AM, Ron Ferguson wrote: Tim, How about Legacy? Ron Ferguson

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 15:46, Ron Ferguson wrote: Do you think that it might be there for extreme splitters:-)? !! Even so, I don't think they'd need to use both, just one or the other. -- Jenny M Benson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages

Re: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Tim Rosenlof
I wonder how they are going to distribute them ? National Archives going to offer the images to the largest companies for indexing ? And I would suppose the microfilms will be delivered soon afterward ? The images being made available to all so we can find our ancestors by their ED ? Etc I

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Tim, If it is a Legacy Charting chart, did you not see their publishing link, and have you not looked at the illustrations which they display. Being in England, postage rules it out for me; oh, I suspect that they do not do the charts themselves, possibly for the reason you mention. Ron

Re: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread Jackie King
Tim - The National Archives this time around is digitizing the images and making them available to anyone who wants them, as I understand it. (Someone correct me, but the last time around, didn't the companies have to digitize the images themselves and that created a huge delay as I remember it.)

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Geoff Rasmussen
In Charting, go to Publish Order Chart. Choose the Photo Glossy paper type - looks really good. Thanks, Geoff Rasmussen Millennia Corporation ge...@legacyfamilytree.com www.LegacyFamilyTree.com http://www.legacyfamilytree.com/ On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Tim Rosenlof spa...@xmission.com

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread mbstx
Re Robert's comment on whether the Title should be omitted if identical to Source List Name, that's something that drives me crazy. It's one more little quirk of Legacy that's easy to forget when making source entries according to Evidence Explained. I also don't think omitting it solves the

RE: [LegacyUG] 1940

2012-03-11 Thread David C Abernathy
Tim, The digitized images will be made available to everyone at 9:00 AM April 2, 2012. This includes any company that wants them. The servers may be very slow at that time, I am not going to get and be at my computer at 6:00 AM my time, to fight getting a image for where ever. Check out the

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Tim Rosenlof
Never mind ! I guess I did not explain what I wanted very well. Tim Rosenlof On 3/11/2012 10:35 AM, Geoff Rasmussen wrote: In Charting, go to Publish Order Chart. Choose the Photo Glossy paper type - looks really good. Thanks, Geoff Rasmussen Millennia Corporation

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
From: John Magyari Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 5:34 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields Ideally I'd like to have some locations with 4 position fields and some with 5 position fields. He where I'm confused.

Re: [LegacyUG] Family Search: Phooey!

2012-03-11 Thread Kirsten Bowman
Craziness! I tried Paul’s link, entered my old registration info, and got a message that it was already used by someone (of course). So then I entered a different name and password (same e-mail address) and FINALLY got in. LUG list members who are having trouble getting access might try the

Re: [LegacyUG] Family Search: Phooey!

2012-03-11 Thread Eliz Hanebury
Thanks, just got me on new.familysearch.org many thanks G Eliz On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Paul Gray grayp...@telus.net wrote: Oops. Sent wrong link. Was trying to shortcut the process. On this page, follow click here to open the registration page, then sign in (upper right) and follow

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread CE WOOD
My locations vary from one (England, say) to six or more when dealing with medieval times in, say, Wales, when I always enter the old kingdom in addition to the modern shire. Sometimes more than six too when I enter a particular abbey or monastery because many are buried there, and I can get

Re: [LegacyUG] Ibid. in reports

2012-03-11 Thread Robert Runion
On one of my four saved .fdb files ( I keep several copies just in case I screw up one so bad it needs to be trashed), I changed the data file .fdb to .mdb and opened it in Access. I then opened 'tblSR' and deleted the column entitled 'SrcTitle', then inserted a blank column and renamed it

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
I don't agree that just because you have a space between two commas, it has to imply that something is missing. Sure it can be, but for those of us who want a very organized approach, it just makes sense because it does allow one to sort by the various divisions, whenever they apply. If you can

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
I'm trying to understand that thinking, Mary. But how could that work if, for example, you had the following? Detroit, Michigan, United States Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, United States Michigan, United States 123 Apple Street, Detroit, Wayne County, Michigan, United States Wayne County,

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jerry and John, Perhaps one of you would be kind enough to explain the difference, in the context of searching, of the following two searches: England, Lancashire, Eccles, Winton and England, Lancashire, ,Winton Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Jerry

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jerry, If a blank between two commas doesn't signify that something is missing, then it signifies nothing at all. In which case, as you say, it is simply there to force a correct location into an incorrect location just to make something look pretty. Frankly I find such constructs both confusing

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread CE WOOD
Examples:Left to Right: Battle of Mynydd Carn, Saint Davids, Deheubarth, Pembrokeshire, Wales Convento de Santa Clara, Tordesillas, Valladolid, Castilla y León, Spain Right to Left: Wales, Pembrokeshire, Deheubarth, Saint Davids, Battle of Mynydd Carn Spain, Castilla y León,

[LegacyUG] probate index

2012-03-11 Thread Tony Rolfe
Thanks to everyone who replied. I've now invented a new event, Award of Probbate which fits the bill nicely. Regards Tony Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
Hi Ron. I guess it will never be settled unless they come up with some kind of standard that works for all of us. To me it is ugly to have dis-similar entities sort with each other, but I was hopeful that someone who uses the right to left method would tell me how I could still sort correctly

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
Not sure what you are looking for, but actually my website does use a right to left sort automatically because it starts with the COUNTRY, then goes to the STATES or PROVINCES, then to the COUNTIES, then to the CITIES or VILLAGES. And Legacy can sort many ways by user choice, as you know. In your

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jenny M Benson
On 11/03/2012 21:31, Jerry wrote: I don't agree that just because you have a space between two commas, it has to imply that something is missing. Sure it can be, but for those of us who want a very organized approach, it just makes sense because it does allow one to sort by the various

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread M. Brenzel
It doesn't matter how many fields you have in your locations. Sorting right to left puts the largest entity first, whatever that may be. I believe that your location examples below somehow got messed up in your message. You have multiple occurrences of Michigan and United States in your

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Jerry, My objection, and that of many other British genealogists, is that forcing out locations to fit a foreign convention gives an inaccurate location. Many of the leading genealogists over here are finding that they are having to spend far too much time trying to influence companies and

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
As far as I know, the way I enter my place names should not give any genealogists in England any problems finding the locations. I find them just fine most of the time with Google or Bing maps and I don't know the locations, of course, as well as you. But looks like I'm doing Lancashire right.

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
Hi again Mary. I think you are misunderstanding the whole sorting system in terms of how most websites do the sorting. It is not simply a matter of whether you go from the left to right or right to left, it is how the sorting schemes deal with each division. If you want to see where I'm coming

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
Sorry, I stated STATES and PROVINCES, but the provinces will be in their own list when clicking on CANADA, since they have PROVINCES and the United States does not.Jerry On 03/11/2012 07:56 PM, Jerry wrote: Hi again Mary. I think you are misunderstanding the whole sorting system in terms

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread M. Brenzel
Jerry, There is NO standard that would work for all of us for all locations. It is a Master Location List for all locations to be listed together. Perhaps you would like Millennia to provide a 3-field Master Location List, a 4-field Master Location List, a 5-field Master Location List, etc.

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread CE WOOD
How true, but some people need to fit everything into square boxes, even if the shapes are not squares, because otherwise they feel lost. Some need more structure than others to survive. CE From: brenze...@roadrunner.com To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] How to

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Larry, I think you are almost correct. It is copying the Event Data onto the Clipboard, but, if I am correct, not the Source. Brian, If this is the case then it is a really serious bug and, for me, is a show stopper. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Larry

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Larry Lee
Ron, In this case it copied nothing. I tried several times pasting into notepad, and Word. Both were blank. I think it may be a bug thus wondering if anyone else with this version is having the issue. Don't want to report it as a bug if it is working correctly for others. Larry On Sun, Mar

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread M. Brenzel
Very impressive site. Please don't take my question/comment as an insult to your research or website. I have one question. Not all places in your lists have 4 fields with commas in place of missing fields. Why is that? I also have one comment. I don't think there is anything odder than to

Re: [LegacyUG] Centennia

2012-03-11 Thread John Roose
Scott - I am a happy user of both AniMap and Centennia. The short answers to your questions are: Is Centennia as detailed as Animap - no. Is it worth its price - yes. First, I wish AniMap went to the township level, not just county (township being smaller political jurisdictions). In many

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Gene Young
On 3/11/2012 8:16 PM, Larry Lee wrote: Anybody else have this issue in Version: 7.5.0.166? When editing an Event, Â clicking the Icon (bottom right) to copy to the clipboard does nothing. Works for me. V7.5.0.166, Win7 Home premium. -- Gene Young Researching Young, Harer, Cox Sallada

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Larry, It copies to the Legacy Event Clipboard, not the Windows Clipboard, I would not, therefore, expect it to paste into another program. Indeed, as it should copy both the Event Data and the Source Data, I cannot see how it possibly can. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Larry Lee
Maybe I am trying to use this incorrectly? If it is copied to the clipboard it should be able to be pasted into another document like Notepad etc., correct? Larry On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 6:11 PM, Gene Young n2...@cfl.rr.com wrote: On 3/11/2012 8:16 PM, Larry Lee wrote: Anybody else have this

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Larry Lee
Thanks for that Ron. Obviously a misunderstanding on my part. Larry On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote: Larry, It copies to the Legacy Event Clipboard, not the Windows Clipboard, I would not, therefore, expect it to paste into another program.

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
Yes, I agree that , , , CANADA might look a bit strange, but it is done because (until more research is done), we only know the person was born in Canada and we want to keep the sorting of the divisions intact. As you probably know, Legacy and other programs allow you to omit the commas when you

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Gene Young
On 3/11/2012 9:15 PM, Larry Lee wrote: Maybe I am trying to use this incorrectly? If it is copied to the clipboard it should be able to be pasted into another document like Notepad etc., correct? Larry No. It can only paste as an event within Legacy. -- Gene Young Researching Young,

RE: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Gavin Nicholson
My question for Jerry is why do you need a standard? For any given country (or indeed groups of countries) the sorting R to L will work because within that country all locations will follow a standard. So if you had a list it might look like: England, County, Town, Street England, Different

Re: [LegacyUG] Family Search: Phooey!

2012-03-11 Thread elizabeth
What is different about the 'new' site? I have used the site at familysearch.org for a while now and never registered or signed in. What would I get access to by registering that I don't get by not registering? Elizabeth === On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:16

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Gene, May I ask you to look again, please. Take the following example: Open an Event for Editing Copy to the Event Clipboard. Select Add a New Event Paste from the Clipboard Are both the Event Data *and* the Source Data being copied? On my test the Source Data was not changed from a marriage

Re: [LegacyUG] Event Clipboard Issue

2012-03-11 Thread Ron Ferguson
Please forget all my previous comments on this subject. I have retested and it is working as it should. Ron Ferguson http://www.fergys.co.uk/ -Original Message- From: Ron Ferguson Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 1:40 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Event

Re: [LegacyUG] How to document Locations in Europe 5 Fields vs 4 Fields

2012-03-11 Thread Jerry
I admit I had not thought about it in terms of each country having its own standard so when you click on a particular country, it would be true to its own standard. I'll have to run some tests and see if that works well and get back at ya. Thanks! --Jerry On 03/11/2012 09:33 PM, Gavin Nicholson

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Sherry/Support
Legacy doesn't print the charts up. They're printed by Generation Maps in Pleasant Grove, UT. You can contact them at i...@generationmaps.com or by calling 801-836-6748. Sincerely, Sherry Technical Support Legacy Family Tree On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Tim Rosenlof spa...@xmission.com

Re: [LegacyUG] Printing

2012-03-11 Thread Larry Lee
Hi Sherry, FYI they are now called Family Chartmasters https://familychartmasters.com/php/index.php Larry On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Sherry/Support she...@legacyfamilytree.com wrote: Legacy doesn't print the charts up. They're printed by Generation Maps in Pleasant Grove, UT. You can

RE: [LegacyUG] Centennia - is there anything similar for the UK

2012-03-11 Thread Olwyn Bourne
I'm nervous about asking a question which has possibly been asked a million times before but .Is there a UK equivalent to AniMap and Centennia? Regards Olwyn From: jbro...@gmail.com Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2012 21:02:50 -0400 Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Centennia To:

RE: [LegacyUG] Family Search: Phooey!

2012-03-11 Thread Carl Cox
What is different about the 'new' site? I have used the site at http://familysearch.org/ familysearch.org for a while now and never registered or signed in. What would I get access to by registering that I don't get by not registering? The site you are looking at is raw data, a place for