The couple did not divorce and remarry Sherry.
I have a modern case of marriage, divorce, remarriage, and those dates were
many years apart.
The case I'm discussing at the moment is very much within a month's time
frame, and after help from others privately and much further examination of
the
Kathy,
I do not know the meaning of booked in either, it may simply mean that the
church involved had been booked for the marriage - hence the charity donation.
It would not mean banns (that's proclamation) and since there is a proclamation
after that date it cannot mean marriage (which would
Thing is though that the Booked In is in the Parish of Findo Gask, while
the 3 Banns are in the Parish of Madderty, some 7 or 8 miles away, yet both
parishes obviously record the same couple.
On 23 October 2013 19:57, Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Kathy,
I do not know the
Hi,
As a new lurker here I can add another case with two weddings with no
divorce in between. I and my wife married in a traditional wedding in
Kenya, and a few months later married again in a church wedding in Sweden.
The first one is the official one for her culture (although we don't have
a
On 23/10/2013 11:20, Kathy Thompson wrote:
Thing is though that the Booked In is in the Parish of Findo Gask,
while the 3 Banns are in the Parish of Madderty, some 7 or 8 miles away,
yet both parishes obviously record the same couple.
A bit of Googling throws up a few mentions of this and
ok, thanks Jenny - I'll make a not of that for future clarifications
On 23 October 2013 20:43, Jenny M Benson ge...@cedarbank.me.uk wrote:
On 23/10/2013 11:20, Kathy Thompson wrote:
Thing is though that the Booked In is in the Parish of Findo Gask,
while the 3 Banns are in the Parish of
An example, of which there are many, in the Sussex Marriage Index
Archdeaconry of Lewes Marriage Licence, Sussex, Date: 21 Feb 1638/9:
Thomas AKEHURST ofJevington a yeoman
to
Mary PAGE a spinster of Blachington
East Blatchington, East Sussex, Date: 19 Mar 1638/9:
Thomas AKEHURST to Mary PAGE
On 2013/10/23 17:49, Alan Pereira wrote:
An example, of which there are many, in the Sussex Marriage Index
Archdeaconry of Lewes Marriage Licence, Sussex, Date: 21 Feb 1638/9:
Thomas AKEHURST ofJevington a yeoman
to
Mary PAGE a spinster of Blachington
East Blatchington, East Sussex,
Daniel,
What you describe is like the one in my family where the couple had two
marriages--one was held in the US ( parish of the bride), the other was
held in another country in the parish of the groom.
How did you record your two marriages in Legacy?
Thanks,
Lavern Hall
On Wed, Oct 23, 2013
My experience agrees with Ron's observation that banns are
proclaimed/published/called in BOTH parishes under normal
circumstances.
And given the British usage of book to mean reserve I've
been assuming all along that was the date someone made the
arrangements to use the church or the priest for
On 2013/10/21 03:04, Kathy Thompson wrote:
The earlier marriage in Madderty reads:
1766 Aug 31 Robert Marshall in this parish and Elizabeth Lawson of Gask parish
were proclaimed _?_ _?_ (I can't make out the last two words but since I
can't
post images to the group.)
The later in
Thanks Mike. Will follow your suggestions, and yes I'm quite glad that
event names can be easily changed if needed without having to re-enter
every detail.
On 21 October 2013 16:56, Mike Fry emjay...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013/10/21 03:04, Kathy Thompson wrote:
The earlier marriage in
Kathy,
I am not sufficiently familiar with Scottish records to answer the question.
However, if you wish I will forward your post to a Scottish colleague for his
opinion.
Please let me know.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
Thank you Ron, I have posted this query on RootsChat, but I would be
grateful for anyone to provide an answer.
Further examination of the Madderty record does show the couple mentioned
twice about 2 weeks apart, and then another slightly ambigous entry a week
later again
As such the four entries
Kathy,
I habe now confirmed that a proclamation is the Scottish equivalent of the
English banns but do not yet know about booked.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
Wonderful - thanks Ron, very much appreciate it
On 21 October 2013 19:13, Ron Ferguson ronfergy@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Kathy,
I habe now confirmed that a proclamation is the Scottish equivalent of the
English banns but do not yet know about booked.
Ron Ferguson
http://www.fergys.co.uk/
: Monday, 21 October 2013 7:53 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One couple, Two weddings, No divorce, how to record
both dates?
Thank you Ron, I have posted this query on RootsChat, but I would be grateful
for anyone to provide an answer.
Further examination
If the couple divorced and remarried, just add a second marriage -
it's as simple as that. You end the first marriage and then add the
second marriage with the new date. You can add a marriage note in the
second marriage about the reason why they remarried. I don't think a
note is necessary for
I have a Scottish couple who married in two parishes on two dates.
31/08/1766 in Madderty, Perth
and then again on
10/09/1766 in Findo Gask, Perth
Both marriage dates are valid and correct for each parish, so how should I
record these?
Thanks
Legacy User Group guidelines:
On 2013/10/20 08:34, Kathy Thompson wrote:
I have a Scottish couple who married in two parishes on two dates.
31/08/1766 in Madderty, Perth
and then again on
10/09/1766 in Findo Gask, Perth
Both marriage dates are valid and correct for each parish, so how should I
record these?
Are you
Kathy,
Mike has already mentioned the possibility of the first date being Banns. Are
you absolutely certain that they are not different couples with the same names
- although because of the additional information given this is less likely with
Scottish records than English.
It is possible
Definite the same couple.
One parish has Him of this parish and her of the other parish
The other has Him of the other parish and her of this parish.
No mention of banns in either.
Will post transcripts of each if you think that may help.
Kathy
On 20 Oct 2013, at 6:07 pm, Ron Ferguson
The earlier marriage in Madderty reads:
1766 Aug 31 Robert Marshall in this parish and Elizabeth Lawson of Gask
parish were proclaimed _?_ _?_ (I can't make out the last two words but
since I can't post images to the group.)
The later in Findo Gask reads:
1766 Sept 10 Robert Marshall in the
additional information.
** **
Charles
** **
*From:* Kathy Thompson [mailto:kmthoms...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:04 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] One couple, Two weddings, No divorce, how to
record both dates
.
Charles
From: Kathy Thompson [mailto:kmthoms...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:04 PM
To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] One couple, Two weddings, No divorce, how to record
both dates?
The earlier marriage in Madderty reads:
1766 Aug 31 Robert Marshall
and Ron can
provide additional information.
** **
Charles
** **
*From:* Kathy Thompson [mailto:kmthoms...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Sunday, October 20, 2013 9:04 PM
*To:* LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com
*Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] One couple, Two weddings, No divorce, how to
record both
26 matches
Mail list logo
