On Fri, Mar 01, 2024 at 10:08:27PM -0500, Richard Fontana wrote:
> I just skimmed through the Fedora packaging guidelines and the
> FESCo-related documentation and didn't seem to find anything on this
> sort of topic.
I think the relevant policy is under the FPC, in the packaging guidelines:
* Tim Flink:
> 4. Is it acceptable to package code which downloads pre-trained weights from
> a non-Fedora source upon first use post-installation by a user if that model
> and its associated weights are
>a. For a specific model?
>b. For a user-defined model which may or may not exist
On 04/03/2024 18.44, Ben Beasley wrote:
> If you want to apply additional review to neural net coefficients, I
> suppose you might as well start with those already packaged in
> stockfish[1]. (I CC’d the stockfish-maintainers email alias to loop in
> the primary maintainer. I am a co-maintainer,
If you want to apply additional review to neural net coefficients, I
suppose you might as well start with those already packaged in
stockfish[1]. (I CC’d the stockfish-maintainers email alias to loop in
the primary maintainer. I am a co-maintainer, and I did the original
package review.)
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:40 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:25 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> > At this point, this discussion is a bit much.
> >
> > We have game engines with data file downloaders for demo content, we
> > have web browsers that auto-download things on launch,
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:25 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> At this point, this discussion is a bit much.
>
> We have game engines with data file downloaders for demo content, we
> have web browsers that auto-download things on launch, and so on.
>
> If you're really worried about it, tweak pytorch to
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 10:08 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:38 PM Tim Flink wrote:
>
> > > pip, as an example is intended to allow users to install python packages
> > > sourced from outside Fedora repos. I don't believe that software which
> > > used pip after
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:38 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> > pip, as an example is intended to allow users to install python packages
> > sourced from outside Fedora repos. I don't believe that software which
> > used pip after installation with no direct user interaction would be
> > allowed in Fedora.
On 3/1/24 15:32, Tim Flink wrote:
On 3/1/24 14:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 4:52 PM Tim Flink
wrote:
On 2/28/24 19:03, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:58 PM Tim Flink
wrote:
On 2/26/24 19:06, Richard Fontana wrote:
4. Is it acceptable to package
On 3/1/24 14:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 4:52 PM Tim Flink wrote:
On 2/28/24 19:03, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:58 PM Tim Flink wrote:
On 2/26/24 19:06, Richard Fontana wrote:
4. Is it acceptable to package code which downloads pre-trained
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 5:20 PM Richard Fontana wrote:
>
> Following Tim's explanations of various things, here are revised
> answers to the questions:
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:32 PM Tim Flink wrote:
>
> > Questions
> > =
> >
> > 1. Are pre-trained weights considered to be normal
Following Tim's explanations of various things, here are revised
answers to the questions:
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:32 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> Questions
> =
>
> 1. Are pre-trained weights considered to be normal non-code content/data or
> do they require special handling?
For Fedora
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 4:54 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> This sounds like it falls in the same bucket as pip, snapd, gem, and
> other similar "package manager" functionality.
I agree, that's a good analogy.
Richard
--
___
legal mailing list --
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 4:52 PM Tim Flink wrote:
>
> On 2/28/24 19:03, Richard Fontana wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:58 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 2/26/24 19:06, Richard Fontana wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> 4. Is it acceptable to package code which downloads pre-trained
On 2/28/24 19:03, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:58 PM Tim Flink wrote:
On 2/26/24 19:06, Richard Fontana wrote:
4. Is it acceptable to package code which downloads pre-trained weights from a
non-Fedora source upon first use post-installation by a user if that model
On Tue, Feb 27, 2024 at 5:58 PM Tim Flink wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2/26/24 19:06, Richard Fontana wrote:
>
>
>
> >> 4. Is it acceptable to package code which downloads pre-trained weights
> >> from a non-Fedora source upon first use post-installation by a user if
> >> that model and its associated
On 2/26/24 19:06, Richard Fontana wrote:
4. Is it acceptable to package code which downloads pre-trained weights from a
non-Fedora source upon first use post-installation by a user if that model and
its associated weights are
a. For a specific model?
b. For a user-defined model
On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 6:32 PM Tim Flink wrote:
> 1. Are pre-trained weights considered to be normal non-code content/data or
> do they require special handling?
My thought is that they should be considered "content" for Fedora
packaging purposes. The legal docs say:
"For purposes of Fedora
18 matches
Mail list logo
