Hello,
I am reviewing package request ghc-failure (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630223 ). This is a haskell
package. Each haskell package has a cabal file (similar to a Makefile say)
that lists, among other things, the license of the sources.
In case of ghc-failure, the license is
lc == lakshminaras2...@gmail com lakshminaras2...@gmail.com writes:
lc Given that the license field in the cabal file is not textually
lc matching the license name that is listed in the webpage, is it ok to
lc go ahead and use Public Domain in the spec file?
That's taking things a bit
There is no explicit disclaimer in the source package.
On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III ti...@math.uh.eduwrote:
lc == lakshminaras2...@gmail com lakshminaras2...@gmail.com
writes:
lc Given that the license field in the cabal file is not textually
lc matching the
