Quoting Iván Sánchez Ortega [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
If the database law attaches, you're using a bad law - one that may well
be repealed, and has been rebuked even by the EC itself.
Pardon me? When has such a thing taken place?
The EU's report on the effectiveness of the Database Right found
On 20 Feb 2008, at 03:05, John Wilbanks wrote:
*Maps* may indeed be copyrighted. The data that underlies those maps
is
probably in the public domain...
And you believe NavTeq and TeleAtlas are also built on a house of cards?
Are the Nokia and TomTom due diligence people really that
On Feb 19, 2008 11:54 PM, John Wilbanks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi everyone. My name is John Wilbanks. I am the VP for Science Commons
at Creative Commons, and I'm the one who wrote the Protocol for
Implementing Open Access to Data.
I've been lurking here for a couple of weeks. I don't like
A Morris wrote:
Think of it more as watermarking
One could also make a case for their being different levels of severity
of watermark. A completely fictitious street is one thing; a
fictitious wayside cross is another. Although I suppose, for the
watermark to be effective, you would need to
A Morris wrote:
Think of it more as watermarking
One could also make a case for their being different levels of severity
of watermark. A completely fictitious street is one thing; a
fictitious wayside cross is another. Although I suppose, for the
watermark to be effective, you would need to
