On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Stephen Gower
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 08:48:18PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
if we are going to have an 'attribution' page on the wiki[1], with the
fine print regarding sources of various chunks of data, would a link
to it be
Up to now there has not been any official guidance on how to comply with the
attribution clause of our CC-BY-SA license. This means that people either
try to do something that they hope is acceptable or they do nothing. Some
of OSM's own outputs fall into the latter category (for example, the
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:19:15PM +0100, 80n wrote:
If you publish OpenStreetMap data you can satisfy the attribution
requirement of the license by linking to or referencing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Attribution;
Discuss.
+1.
cu bart
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up to now there has not been any official guidance on how to comply with the
attribution clause of our CC-BY-SA license. This means that people either
try to do something that they hope is acceptable or they do nothing. Some
of
Hallo,
I'd like to propose that we make the following statement:
If you publish OpenStreetMap data you can satisfy the attribution
requirement of the license by linking to or referencing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Attribution;
But you are aware of the fact that it
Quoting Michael Collinson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I echo Tom's sentiment that www.openstreetmap.org/Attribution would be
a cleaner public link to present if possible.
You can request under BY-SA 2.0 that a URL be presented with the work.
See BY-SA 2.0 section 4.c:
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:40 PM, Tom Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would certainly prefer that people using our data provide a link
to www.openstreetmap.org or the top level wiki index page as that
would do a better job of
Michael Collinson wrote:
Other than that, well, I think we both share the same opinion that
the current license is just unworkable full stop! :-)
There's probably not a lot of point making a big song and dance about
attribution at present. In a month or two's time, when we're ready to
vote
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 1:47 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hallo,
I'd like to propose that we make the following statement:
If you publish OpenStreetMap data you can satisfy the attribution
requirement of the license by linking to or referencing
quote who=80n
I would prefer a url like attribution.openstreetmap.org or
www.openstreetmap.org/attribution but it should still, IMHO, point to the
same wiki page.
I agree with www.openstreetma.org/attribution ; however, I don't think
that wikifying the attribution would be a good idea.
Hi All,
On the wiki for out of copyright maps, it states:
Maps published by the Ordnance Survey are Crown Copyright as
stipulated in the terms of The Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1998
(http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1988/Ukpga_19880048_en_1.htm).
Therein, Chapter X. Section 163,
Tim Sheerman-Chase wrote:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Out_of_copyright
Is that interpretation about the FIRST year of publication definitely
correct? Or should it be the year of last update? Has this been
discussed before?
The FIRST is pretty meaningless. The 1954 revision of a
Michael Collinson wrote:
I echo Tom's sentiment that www.openstreetmap.org/Attribution
http://www.openstreetmap.org/Attribution would be a cleaner public
link to present if possible.
The shorter, the better (sometimes space is limited). So why not, with a
small DNS change:
Hello,
I've been involved in some ongoing dialogue with Natural Resources,
Government of Canada, who are keen for their National Road Network to
be used by OSM. There are a few particularities of the license that
need clarifying on OSM's party. Natural Resources are happy that OSM's
current
On 08/04/2008, 80n [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
if we are going to have an 'attribution' page on the wiki[1], with the
fine print regarding sources of various chunks of data, would a link
to it be possible, on the main map page? titled say 'data attribution'
or 'data sources'?
Have
Robin Paulson wrote:
have i missed something? i thought osm used Creative Commons
Attribution-ShareAlike 2.0 license not Creative Commons Share Alike
2.5 Licence
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/OpenStreetMap_License
I assume the name difference was just loose wording; all recent CC
On 08/04/2008, Nick Black [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I've been involved in some ongoing dialogue with Natural Resources,
Government of Canada, who are keen for their National Road Network to
be used by OSM. There are a few particularities of the license that
need clarifying on
Nick Black wrote:
Hello,
I've been involved in some ongoing dialogue with Natural Resources,
Government of Canada, who are keen for their National Road Network to
be used by OSM. There are a few particularities of the license that
need clarifying on OSM's party. Natural Resources are happy
18 matches
Mail list logo
