I agree with the judgment. You can't make a derivative work
without permission.
OSM and other open source projects give people permission
to create derivative works provided they follow the license
rules. If they could make derivative works without permission
then there would be no way to require
I just read through http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2008/71.html
In 128 the appellate court is saying that they did not copy facts, but
instead they copied
the guide created by Nine, because the aggregatators had pretty much copied the
guide created by nine.
In 123 Ice is saying
On Sun, 11 May 2008, Jeffrey Martin wrote:
I just read through
http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/cases/cth/FCAFC/2008/71.html
In 128 the appellate court is saying that they did not copy facts, but
instead they copied
the guide created by Nine, because the aggregatators had pretty much copied
the
Jeffrey Martin wrote:
Some lists want me to answer on the top and some on the bottom.
Is this a bottom answer email list?
Most email lists will accept the style where you answer below the thing
you are commenting on, but trim it well so people don't have to page
past loads of verbiage to get
