Peter Millar schreef:
- Original Message -
From: Henk Hoff o...@toffehoff.nl
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Saturday, 6 June, 2009 01:54:07 GMT +00:00 GMT Britain, Ireland,
Portugal
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL RC and
Hi,
Henk Hoff wrote:
It is proposed to removed the clause 4.7 altogether
I think that is a good idea.
Just to clarify:
* I use OSM data to create a printed A-Z map of London (which is clearly
not a data base, is it?)
* I publish that produced work under a BSD license
* A competing project
On Tue, Jun 9, 2009 at 12:12 AM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
Before, the reverse engineering clause would have kicked in and forced
FSM to be under ODBL. In the future, the above will be fully legal, and
the resulting FSM database, which contains facts derived from OSM data
but
I could in theory make it, and I even considered it for about 10
seconds... but I couldn't think what I'd get out of it other than
frustration.
DRM for maps, sorry GeoDRM... what can you say but FAIL ?
Best
Steve
On 5 Jun 2009, at 08:10, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
Hi all,
Maybe this is
On Tue, 9 Jun 2009, SteveC wrote:
I could in theory make it, and I even considered it for about 10
seconds... but I couldn't think what I'd get out of it other than
frustration.
DRM for maps, sorry GeoDRM... what can you say but FAIL ?
Best
Steve
Trouble is, these people continue
