Hello,
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks? Could Microsoft, at some day, just
force us to remove everything with source=Bing on it? Am I forced to have this
source tag there? Should stuff, taken from Bing, be verified via GPS track at
some time to get the data secure?
One risk,
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:16, Manuel Reimer a écrit :
is it secure to use Bing? Any license risks? Could Microsoft, at some
day, just force us to remove everything with source=Bing on it? Am I
forced to have this source tag there? Should stuff, taken from Bing,
be verified via GPS
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors term,
How are they connected? please explain.
thanks,
mike
___
legal-talk mailing list
Renaud MICHEL wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors term,
as I have explicitly accepted them (version 1.0), and every mapper who
registered after March 2010 (correct?) are also contributing under CT 1.0?
I also did so and I *want* my contributions to get
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:49, Mike Dupont a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors
term,
How are they connected? please explain.
Because of the terms of the CT, I
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com wrote:
Le dimanche 05 décembre 2010 à 11:49, Mike Dupont a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:33 AM, Renaud MICHEL r.h.michel+...@gmail.com
wrote:
Is it OK to use bing imagery when you have accepted the contributors
Before this thread goes any further,Yes, a cock-up I believe, possibly mine.
The un-highlighted text should be the same as CT 1.0. Thank you fx99 for
pointing it out. Will investigate.
Mike
At 03:39 PM 3/12/2010, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
David Groom wrote:
If the OSMF board wish to move
