On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com
wrote:
I read this as saying that the terms of use, which are there as a hold
harmless waiver, don't grant any rights. It specifically states
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com
wrote:
city changed the click through to address those problems. The agreement
is
located here: http://gispub02.sfgov.org/website/sfshare/index2
The city of San Francisco has made a bunch of geo data available. I plan on
importing the address nodes so that we can have door to door routing for San
Francisco and for geocoding purposes. I just want to see if the click
through is compatible. My understanding is that the data is basically
Any info on who, or at least what percentage of people, clicked on the all
my edits are public domain checkbox?
Just curious.
Cheers,
Greg
On Sat, Oct 9, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote:
as part of the voluntary relicensing phase of the move to ODbL,
existing
here what exactly I need to ask for with respect to licensing? Just
explicit permission to use the data in OSM? Anything else?
Thanks,
Greg
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 5:11 AM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.comwrote:
I must have missed that particular section somehow.
I sent off an email
I must have missed that particular section somehow.
I sent off an email to ask the city if we could get the data under a license
we could use. We'll see what happens.
As to how many OSMers are in the city its hard to say exactly. There are a
few people working on the map pretty frequently and
