On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Taking a step back, is the above use case not one we'd like to support
without triggering share alike? I'm directing my question to everyone, not
just Paul who's taken the time to review my example above.
Thanks for taking
or giving data back when you fix things.
This is a gross oversimplification of share-alike. And the imperfections in
the license extend beyond geocoding. I don't want to rehash the arguments,
as Alex Barth did http://stateofthemap.us/session/more-open/ very
eloquently at State of the Map US.
Alex,
I'm a little confused. The way I interpret your comment, merely storing
ODbL and non-ODbL data in the same database triggers share alike. But on
the use cases wiki page (
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/License/Use_Cases), Case 4 says:
'It makes no difference whether you store the data
