Re: [OSM-legal-talk] wikidata cc0 <> odbl

2017-12-03 Thread Jo
ing > you weren't creating something that depended on already existing OSM data). > > IANAL > > Simon > > Am 03.12.2017 um 13:48 schrieb Jo: > > Time to open up a whole new fresh can of worms > > Call me werid, but I like the idea of cooperation between opendata > pro

[OSM-legal-talk] wikidata cc0 <> odbl

2017-12-03 Thread Jo
Time to open up a whole new fresh can of worms Call me werid, but I like the idea of cooperation between opendata projects, but differences in licensing don't make this exactly easy. So here goes. Let's start with a node. a) I add a node (say for a school) to OSM. Since it's coming from an

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ECJ confirmed 96/9/EG for printed maps

2016-03-14 Thread Jo
, Jo 2016-03-14 18:23 GMT+01:00 James Tabor <ja...@dataforwards.com>: > If someone could remove me from the email list that would be great. Could > not find an unsub button. > > Many thanks > > James > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 14 Mar 2016, at 15:20, Tom Lee

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Using data from Ville de Montréal

2013-06-06 Thread Jo
://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors is the source reference for the public. Jo * 2013/6/6 Guillaume Pratte guilla...@guillaumepratte.net Hello, The Ville de Montréal has some interesting data available under their own licence: http://donnees.ville.montreal.qc.ca/licence/licence-texte

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [GIS-Kosova] OSM road network for Kosova

2013-03-07 Thread Jo
bot retroactively, but I guess that's only interesting for larger regions. It's probably going to cost an administrator a good deal of time to do it. Jo 2013/3/7 Bekim Kajtazi bekim.kajt...@gmail.com Whatever case it is...the data is gone!!! On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:16 AM, Martin

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] There is no copyright on way tags like street names

2011-12-27 Thread Jo
Simply add odbl=clean to the way, after verifying it and you'll be fine. A few days later, or maybe even the next day it won't show up as problematic anymore. OSM wants to be extra careful, regarding copyright laws, and we always have been. So we'll also have to be when we want to change the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Transition to CC-4 instead of destroying data

2011-12-19 Thread Jo
2011/12/19 Mike Dupont jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 1:21 PM, Ed Avis e...@waniasset.com wrote: Simon Poole simon at poole.ch writes: The upgrade clause in 4.b of CC-by-SA 2.0 a) only applies to a Derivative Work. While this is only a small hurdle to surmount,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] I am not going to remove any old node in my hometown

2011-12-12 Thread Jo
not dragging bits and pieces of information that were contributed by a naysayer/unreachable along to the new objects I'm creating. Unfortunately this checking requieres a lot of effort in itself though, but the tools are getting better. Jo 2011/12/12 fk270...@fantasymail.de After watching the License

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] The detrimental effects of database

2011-11-23 Thread Jo
is stored after it is DL'ed and where; how I can fetch it programmatically. Jo ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License

2008-02-22 Thread jo
. The choice probably is not going to make that much difference. So pick the option that makes access and reuse easiest. love, jo ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/legal-talk