On 25 April 2013 11:14, Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es wrote:
The folks who drafted the EU DB directive most likely were not aware that
in a
near future, a person from a country A could put data about country B in a
DB
inside a computer in a country C...
But in their world view
On 8 April 2011 11:38, Nick Hocking nick.hock...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Ed,
transfer rights to the OSMF
I believe that this is the (only) critical issue. To be open contributions
need to be given freely and without restriction, so as to avoid the current
situation where some contributors
On 7 October 2010 10:43, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
On 10/07/2010 10:04 AM, Ed Avis wrote:
Rob Myersr...@... writes:
I'm coming to the conclusion that individual contributor of original data
to OSM and institutional importer of a third party database should be
treated differently,
On 26 August 2010 01:05, Sebastian Hohmann m...@s-hohmann.de wrote:
Starting a new project would be like rebuilding the whole house, just to
make it a new color. The upgrade clause is like repainting the house, but
restricting this to only very few colors, might make a future owner unhappy.
On 25 August 2010 08:41, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
It is bad enough if the share-alike minority force their will on the rest
of the project now; we must not allow them to force their will on everybody
who is in OSM in 10 years' time.
I find this oft-repeated argument to be
On 14 August 2010 10:14, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2010 10:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I might miss the point: but why do some governments put their data
under cc-by or cc-by-sa licenses if those are not suitable for data
but only for
