Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
It's been proposed by me several times in the past. I think it's
essential. I don't know of a similar major project that doesn't do some
kind of assignment. Wikipedia is the nearest, but Wikipedia is a
collection of articles that all stand on their own.
Can you
My apologies but the DBL text seems to be mis-formatted -- probably
as a result of my last wordpress update. It should be fixed now, but
just in case the downloads offer the canonical version.
Thanks!
~Jordan
Mr. Jordan S Hatcher, JD, LLM
jordan at opencontentlawyer dot com
OC Blog:
Jordan S Hatcher wrote:
I'd like to note that, just to clarify, factual data is generally not
copyrightable, and so there would be nothing to assign.
Why is it that we are assuming (and I'm not just saying this to Jordan)
that the individual nodes and ways in OSM are factual data? I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gervase Markham wrote:
| Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote:
| Long term, we can avoid the ambiguity by making it clear that all data
| belongs to OSM, whoever that is (probably the foundation), then we can
| let the foundation change the license whenever
