Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Adding OSM-ids to an external database and publish in CC-BY

2020-03-31 Thread Falk Zscheile
Am 31.03.20 um 19:56 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer: > In Italy we have been discussing this situation: a member of the community > wants to add links to OSM objects into a list of specific shops (those that > are open during the covid-19 pandemia). > > The list will be published here:

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Adding OSM-ids to an external database and publish in CC-BY

2020-03-31 Thread Kathleen Lu via legal-talk
I don't think you even need to get into https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Metadata_Layers_-_Guideline or the substantial question. https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence/Community_Guidelines/Horizontal_Map_Layers_-_Guideline and

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Adding OSM-ids to an external database and publish in CC-BY

2020-03-31 Thread Tom Lee via legal-talk
This seems similar to the problem discussed here: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Metadata_Layers_-_Guideline The doctrine proposed by Richard Fairhurst (and discussed on that page) strikes me as reasonable. It's hard for me to see how OSM IDs could qualify as a substantial

[OSM-legal-talk] Adding OSM-ids to an external database and publish in CC-BY

2020-03-31 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
In Italy we have been discussing this situation: a member of the community wants to add links to OSM objects into a list of specific shops (those that are open during the covid-19 pandemia). The list will be published here: https://www.covid19italia.help/opendata/ with an CC-BY-4.0 license. The