On 24/08/2010 11:35, Ed Avis wrote:
... under the proposed ODbL or whether it would technically be in
breach of the
contract-law provisions
But presumably I as Joe Mapper wouldn't be restricted in going back to
the OS with a bunch of errors that I've found after comparing what I've
mapped
andrzej zaborowski balr...@... writes:
That's what I think the plan is. However it is made very difficult by
the fact that those data providers most likely chose their SA licenses
in order to be able to use any improvements made on top of their data,
which we are planning to very soon make
At 10:46 AM 14/08/2010, Rob Myers wrote:
On 08/14/2010 07:33 AM, Liz wrote:
If you believe, like many data donors, that the attribution must be preserved,
then a licence which incorporates the viral provisions is necessary.
The ODbL does incorporate attribution. From a given work you can find
- Original Message -
From: 80n 80n...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY-SA is compatible with ODbL - a
philosophical point
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 5:44 PM,
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 7:50 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.netwrote:
- Original Message - From: 80n 80n...@gmail.com
To: Licensing and other legal discussions. legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Sent: Sunday, August 22, 2010 6:26 PM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is CC-BY-SA is
At 10:11 AM 13/08/2010, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:47 PM, David Groom
mailto:revi...@pacific-rim.netrevi...@pacific-rim.net wrote:
b) Ignoring the Yahoo data, but taking any data that may have had a PD or
CC-BY-SA clause that has be used in import, since these are general
permissions
On Sat, 14 Aug 2010, Mike Collinson wrote:
Personal conclusion: The CC-BY-SA license are great on fully creative
works. It was never intended to be applied to highly factual data and
information, and if it is, it is vague and confusing. If you believe
strongly in pandemic virality, then it
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
At 10:11 AM 13/08/2010, 80n wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 11:47 PM, David Groom revi...@pacific-rim.net
wrote:
b) Ignoring the Yahoo data, but taking any data that may have had a PD or
CC-BY-SA clause that has be
Michael Collinson wrote:
I have moved this from [OSM-talk] Voluntary re-licensing
begins to legal talk as it is worth further discussion in
view of dilemmas faced by our Australian community. I
understand that CC-BY-SA is currently a preferred vehicle
for releasing government data.
Is
On 14 August 2010 18:46, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Is it? I thought most of the Australian Government data was CC-BY - a much
easier problem.
To the best of my knowledge you are correct. Perhaps he was thinking
of some other country that has had cc-by-sa data imported?
On 14 August 2010 19:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
I might miss the point: but why do some governments put their data
under cc-by or cc-by-sa licenses if those are not suitable for data
but only for works?
That was Liz's point, and they usually have more lawyers than we
On 14 August 2010 10:14, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
On 14 August 2010 10:09, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
I might miss the point: but why do some governments put their data
under cc-by or cc-by-sa licenses if those are not suitable for data
but only for
Francis Davey wrote:
Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote
Is it? I thought most of the Australian Government data was
CC-BY - a much easier problem.
But still incompatible with the contributor terms in the sense
that a CC-BY licensee does not have sufficient rights to agree
to
80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
In order to submit CC-BY-SA under the contributor terms you need to give
OSMF rights that you don't possess.
CC-BY-SA does not grant you a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive,
perpetual, irrevocable license to do any act that is restricted by
copyright and so
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Robert Whittaker (OSM)
robert.whittaker+...@gmail.com wrote:
However, lets suppose (hope?) that the CT's are changed so they're no
longer a problem. The question still remains as to whether CC-By or
CC-By-SA are compatible with ODbL+DbCL.
If the work is
15 matches
Mail list logo
