On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com wrote:
I read this as saying that the terms of use, which are there as a hold
harmless waiver, don't grant any rights. It specifically states that if the
city is claiming copyright on the data it will do so in the file or on
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 12:08 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 6:56 PM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com
wrote:
I read this as saying that the terms of use, which are there as a hold
harmless waiver, don't grant any rights. It specifically states
Making sure mike sees this thread... He's been talking to the same people I
believe.
Steve
stevecoast.com
On Dec 11, 2010, at 1:27 PM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com wrote:
city changed the click through to
On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 4:27 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com
wrote:
city changed the click through to address those problems. The agreement
is
located here:
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 9:16 AM, Gregory Arenius greg...@arenius.com wrote:
city changed the click through to address those problems. The agreement is
located here: http://gispub02.sfgov.org/website/sfshare/index2.asp.
See this clause:
These Terms of Use do not grant You any title or right to
On 09/12/2010 22:16, Gregory Arenius wrote:
The city of San Francisco has made a bunch of geo data available. I
plan on importing the address nodes so that we can have door to door
routing for San Francisco and for geocoding purposes. I just want to
see if the click through is compatible.
The city of San Francisco has made a bunch of geo data available. I plan on
importing the address nodes so that we can have door to door routing for San
Francisco and for geocoding purposes. I just want to see if the click
through is compatible. My understanding is that the data is basically
