Hi
It would be great if someone could convince the JOSM people to remove
the ODbL blurb in JOSM, people get scared and spam everyone who hasn't
agreed to the new license.
I do not appreciate getting lots of ODbL FUD spam,
--
/emj
___
legal-talk
On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 10:57:57 +0100, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi
It would be great if someone could convince the JOSM people to remove
the ODbL blurb in JOSM, people get scared and spam everyone who hasn't
agreed to the new license.
I do not appreciate getting lots of ODbL
Hi,
On 11/24/2010 10:57 AM, Erik Johansson wrote:
It would be great if someone could convince the JOSM people to remove
the ODbL blurb in JOSM, people get scared and spam everyone who hasn't
agreed to the new license.
I do not appreciate getting lots of ODbL FUD spam,
Are you sure this has
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
On 11/24/2010 10:57 AM, Erik Johansson wrote:
It would be great if someone could convince the JOSM people to remove
the ODbL blurb in JOSM, people get scared and spam everyone who hasn't
agreed to the new
Erik,
Erik Johansson wrote:
Yes I'm sure it has to do with JOSM
Why are you sure? Have they told you so? I still don't see what it is
about JOSM in particular that is a problem. As I said, the license
change is advertised in many other places too.
I don't think we should stop informing
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Erik,
Erik Johansson wrote:
Yes I'm sure it has to do with JOSM
Why are you sure? Have they told you so?
Yes.
And I'm very disappointed that people think mass mailing is ok, it's
not informing people in any useful
On 25 November 2010 09:30, Erik Johansson erjo...@gmail.com wrote:
3. give the finger to all people anti ODbL
At least you are being honest, which is more than Frederik seems to be
capable of, you don't make any pretense that there was ever any kinda
of democratic process going on and the whole
On 25 November 2010 12:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Frederik is a generous and respected contributor to the OpenStreetMap
community. His record speaks for itself and he doesn't need me or
anybody else to stand up for him.
Regardless of other deeds, he has been less than
On 25 November 2010 02:10, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Frederik is a generous and respected contributor to the OpenStreetMap
community. His record speaks for itself and he doesn't need me or
anybody else to stand
On 25 November 2010 12:14, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 02:10, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Frederik is a generous and respected contributor to the OpenStreetMap
community.
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
How charming that you use selective quoting to fabricate a lie of
omission. Viewing the original shows no lie. And that your
fabrication failed to gain traction the first time you trotted it out.
On 25 November 2010 02:22, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:14, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 02:10, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 November 2010 12:05, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Frederik is
On 25 November 2010 12:41, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 9:22 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
How charming that you use selective quoting to fabricate a lie of
omission. Viewing the original shows no lie. And that your
fabrication failed to
13 matches
Mail list logo
