On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 10:35:21AM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Simon Ward wrote:
this could mean that
anyone running osm2pgsql importing minutely data updates would possibly
have to make available a ''psql dump of the whole planet'' for any
snapshot time where someone cares to request
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I'm surprised that nobody else seems to see a problem in this. Am I
perhaps barking up some completely imaginary tree?
Not at all; I am still reading through the draft, and have exactly the same
concern.
It may be I have misunderstood how this is intended to apply, but I
2009/3/1 Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com:
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I'm surprised that nobody else seems to see a problem in this. Am I
perhaps barking up some completely imaginary tree?
Nope, not at all, I'm exceptionally concerned about the
Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
With the GPL, the right to request the source is attached to receiving
and using the binary. Withe the AGPL it is attached to being a user of
the service. You can't just wander by and say hey! please can I have
the source?, you have to be a user of the
Hi,
Frederik Ramm wrote:
We need to clarify this once and for all: Where exactly in the following
typical rendering chain does the thing cease to be a database in our
definition?
* download (section of) OSM data
* make changes to OSM data
* render OSM data into vector graphics format
Hi,
Dair Grant wrote:
It may be I have misunderstood how this is intended to apply, but I think
both 4.6a and 4.6b end up making derivative databases (effectively any
mechanical processing of the original content whatsoever, IMO) problematic.
In many cases, generating a file containing all
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 10:58:04PM +0100, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Having to grant access to pgsql data base
---
In this use case we look at someone who does nothing more than taking
OSM data and rearranging it according to fixed rules, e.g. by running it
Simon Ward si...@... writes:
The lawyer's answer is: Need clarification here. From my reading, this
example would seem to constitute a Derivative Database under the ODbL.
It’s a database, derived from the original. To me it’s a derived
database. It does need clarifying to say just
