andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Also a different question is bothering me. The old license is
the well known CC-BY-SA, so it is automatically compatible
with sources (and consumers) using the same license. So,
say I've uploaded a lot of information based on wikipedia,
conscious that I'm
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Also a different question is bothering me. The old license is the
well known CC-BY-SA, so it is automatically compatible with sources
(and consumers) using the same license. So, say I've uploaded a lot
of information based on wikipedia, conscious that I'm uploading
Hi,
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
By all means have an optional _poll_ beforehand among people who care.
If 75% of participants in such a (public) poll say cool, let's go ahead
with this license then I'd say it's ok to start offering it to mappers.
If 75% say I think this needs some more work
Peter Miller wrote:
I suggest that a decision made on the basis of a vote if preferable to
one made on the basis of who shouts loudest and is also better than
one made 'be decree' (which is what I think is being considered at
present).
Frederik's email of 16.40 covers what I would like
Rob Myers wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
I suggest that a decision made on the basis of a vote if preferable to
one made on the basis of who shouts loudest and is also better than
one made 'be decree' (which is what I think is being considered at
present).
Frederik's email of 16.40
2009/1/25 Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net:
andrzej zaborowski wrote:
Also a different question is bothering me. The old license is
the well known CC-BY-SA, so it is automatically compatible
with sources (and consumers) using the same license. So,
say I've uploaded a lot of
On 24 Jan 2009, at 15:27, Rob Myers wrote:
Peter Miller wrote:
Without a public vote the board are effectively saying to each and
every one of use individually: 'accept these new terms or please
leave the community now and don't slam the door - oh, and we will
remove your data shortly'.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Sent: 22 January 2009 11:10 PM
To: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Licensing Working Group report, 2009/01/22
Hi,
Mikel Maron wrote:
We want to move ahead with this draft of the license asap. The license
won't be perfect
Hi,
thank you for making the December minutes available. From them I see
that you're already having your next meeting today.
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
The licence doesn't get implemented if the vote is against its
implementation. If that were to happen then the licence would
-talk] Licensing Working Group report,
2009/01/22
On 22 Jan 2009, at 23:05, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/1/22 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com:
Hi Fredrik
Will they be available to process our input after we see the text?
Is there any plan for how our feedback will be processed before
On 24 Jan 2009, at 00:25, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
thank you for making the December minutes available. From them I
see
that you're already having your next meeting today.
Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
The licence doesn't get implemented if the vote is against its
Hi Fredrik
Will they be available to process our input after we see the text?
Is there any plan for how our feedback will be processed before the
public is asked to accept the new license - will it be *our* job to take
the lawyers' version and our feedback and make something suitable from
2009/1/22 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com:
Hi Fredrik
Will they be available to process our input after we see the text?
Is there any plan for how our feedback will be processed before the
public is asked to accept the new license - will it be *our* job to take
the lawyers' version and
Hi,
Mikel Maron wrote:
We want to move ahead with this draft of the license asap. The license won't
be perfect,
but there will definitely be a process for feedback and improvements, and the
license
will get there. In the immediate term, the OSM community kick starts this
process
by
On 22 Jan 2009, at 23:05, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
2009/1/22 Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com:
Hi Fredrik
Will they be available to process our input after we see the text?
Is there any plan for how our feedback will be processed before the
public is asked to accept the new license -
15 matches
Mail list logo
