Sorry, I have accidentally pressed the enter button before writing my text.
That's the technical disadvantage of an old-fashioned mailing list!
Currently, the LWG intends to delete all nodes ever created by decliners or
non-responders. This would be detrimental for long routes, as I have
Hi,
On 11/23/11 15:16, fk270...@fantasymail.de wrote:
Currently, the LWG intends to delete all nodes ever created by
decliners or non-responders.
That is correct as far as I know.
There is no contributor who has ever contributed even a 50% majority
of nodes on these routes. However, they
Hi,
On 11/23/2011 06:22 PM, 80n wrote:
I don't see how it could be in anyone's interest to taint the map by
leaving in nodes that could, just possibly, be claimed to infringe
someone's rights.
I part agree, part disagree with that.
I don't think that our bar should be no data that could,
It's not like it's going to be hard to recreate all this stuff. It
didn't take long to create in the first place
... when we had a fraction of the community we have now, less accurate
aerial imagery and no secondary data sources to compare against. Re-mapping
not only removes the license
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-The-detrimental-effects-of-database-tp7024478p7025537.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk
On 24 November 2011 05:09, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
But I think that the specific example under discussion here actually falls
short of even this lowered bar. It is quite possible for me to grab a whole
Way in JOSM and move it one metre to the left (which makes me the last
2011/11/23 Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
But I think that the specific example under discussion here actually falls
short of even this lowered bar. It is quite possible for me to grab a whole
Way in JOSM and move it one metre to the left (which makes me the last
editor of, potentially,