Lauri Hahne [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
2008/8/5 Gustav Foseid [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
- In addition to protection as individual photographs, the database of the
photographs has database protection. The traces (KMZz) would, however, not
be part of the database and not be protected as a
a recording (over 3 youtube videos) of Ed Parsons Mapmaker can be found here:
http://www.youtube.com/user/ikiyamaps
On 8/1/08, SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Has the recording of that session been made live?
On 31 Jul 2008, at 17:14, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
this question
On Wed, 6 Aug 2008, Gustav Foseid wrote:
If the photographing or tracing involves creative work, something it
probably does not, it would all be different.
Deciding which is railway, which is road and which is canal on the aerial
photograph is intellectual work, so labelling of traces is
On 1 Aug 2008, at 01:14, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Question 1 - is that what Ed said? And question 2 - does it make
sense,
legally? And question 3 - so I am allowed to trace my house, and my
neighbour's, and my workplace, and the bakery I visit every morning,
and
my birthplace, and my
Hi,
Question 1 - is that what Ed said?
I believe that is in fact what he has said. It surprised me, because
it leaves a lot of room for debate, and thats why...
And question 2 - does it make sense,
legally?
...I think this could be dangerous waters in a legal sense. I have
been living
Hi,
this question is directed at those that were present during the
questions session following Ed Parsons' talk at this year's SOTM.
If I remember correctly, Ed had just explained that Google needed to buy
extra tracing licenses for aerial imagery to be used in Map Maker, and
that these
