Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Warning about not mapping military areas

2020-12-24 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
Am Di., 22. Dez. 2020 um 10:12 Uhr schrieb Edward Bainton < bainton@gmail.com>: > > Dangerous: I think there's a risk that by saying, "please follow local > laws" (rather than saying nothing), we open ourselves to accusations of not > policing "our" mappers properly. You can imagine the

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Warning about not mapping military areas

2020-12-23 Thread Tom Hummel via legal-talk
Hello list, some things come to mind 1) The Foundation is bound by laws that govern its own jurisdiction. (obligatory?) Other laws shall be respected to the extend the Foundation chooses to. (facultative?) 2) There are 3rd party rights, that the Foundation observes globally. Under its

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Warning about not mapping military areas

2020-12-22 Thread Edward Bainton
(Frederik's came in while I was drafting this.) What was the reason for you wanting to put that warning there? Do you know of actual problems that a warning like that would have prevented, or was it (as your email suggests) "Looks like others have done this; we should to" ? With all due respect