sent from a phone
> On 27. Oct 2020, at 22:15, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk
> wrote:
>
> Again, not conducting a comprehensive survey here, but if 95% of the polygons
> match OSM polygons, then even if there is technically a derivative database,
> then I think this simply isn't worth our time
Given that the attribution is exactly as requested on the website, I would
imagine any issues with below 993 layout pixels is an oversight or a bug. A
friendly email would suffice, but it certainly does not merit a letter from
OSMF. You are free to send the email yourself.
OSM does not contain
sent from a phone
> On 28. Oct 2020, at 16:19, Kathleen Lu wrote:
>
> Actually quality scores would be not be subject to sharealike, per the
> Collective Database Guideline.
Why does the collective database guideline apply? Aren‘t they coloring
OpenStreetMap derived data? To me this looks
