On 21 Feb 2008, at 11:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting SteveC [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 21 Feb 2008, at 08:47, Rob Myers wrote:
- I have violated the contract but I am completely anonymous and
untraceable. Nobody can find out who I am to do anything about this.
And
OSM would want
Hi,
On 20.02.2008, at 20:37, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hm. Suppose we used a restrictive copyleft license lice the ODL,
but at
the same time said that 12 months after being last edited, we release
stuff into the public domain.
[...]
Maybe we can find a compromise along these lines.
No
Frederik Ramm wrote:
To me at least, it seems obvious what Rob says. If you have something
that is not copyrighted, and you give it someone [A] under a contract,
and that person breaches te contract and publishes the data, then
whatever you gave him is up for grabs by anyone [B] as they're
Frederik Ramm wrote:
[1] even more theoretical aside: maybe we should dual-license to also
say we'll sell you full non-exclusive rights to planet.osm for £5,000
a node ;)
I have a feeling that Rob can't be bought.
I'm pro-copyleft and I'd support this :-) It's clear it would be more
money
Hi,
I'm a bit confused. Isn't that situation, in US jurisdiction, a
problem
with any copyleft license that would be adopted? I can do this with
gpl
software, too. I can download the linux kernel, take away the license
notices and then sell it to someone to use in a proprietary product.
Geographical features simply don't change very often. I don't think the fact
that the data is one year old would discourage someone from copying stuff
into their own proprietary dataset.
Aled.
On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 2:13 PM, Frederik Ramm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
No comments on that by
Hi,
What would be lost if someone copied the February 2007 planet into
their own proprietary dataset today?
The principle of share-alike.
Ah, the good old mantra I won't give you anything unless you give me
something in return. Fair enough, it's the base pillar of commerce.
And
