[OSM-legal-talk] PGS coastline

2011-06-05 Thread OJ W
My account used for importing PGS coastlines just got an email asking that it agree to new contributor terms - has anyone already declared this is OK during the import-checking phase of license change? Asking on mailing list, since there should be about 32 other accounts used for the import and

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] PGS coastline

2011-06-05 Thread OJ W
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:35 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Catalog That's exactly what I was looking for, thanks. ___ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Non-existant streets

2009-08-12 Thread OJ W
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:02 AM, John Smithdelta_foxt...@yahoo.com wrote: I tried to search the list archives before posting but couldn't see anything about this. The problem is people noticing non-existant streets on other maps and wasting time to only find out that it doesn't exist, not

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Privacy and Terms

2009-06-25 Thread OJ W
Will there be some OSM-specific privacy implications not covered in the generic policy? e.g. when people use openstreetmap.org, they are potentially revealing their home/work/holiday locations, their routes to work, the pubs they visit (assuming their first OSM edit is to add their regular

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] License to kill

2009-03-05 Thread OJ W
The UK canals don't contribute to the licensing discussions because you mapped them as PD. So we can do whatever we want with the canal data without having to consult anyone. On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote: OJ W wrote: Given that maps need

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Concerns about ODbL

2009-03-02 Thread OJ W
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 1:56 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: OJ W wrote: the ability to create an uncopiable map image from OSM data does seem to have appeared in the ODbL license? You can create an image and (provided that your image is not a data base, a distinction that has

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] License Plan discussion on talk...

2009-03-01 Thread OJ W
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 5:34 PM, Peter Miller peter.mil...@itoworld.com wrote: Can we also ensure that any issues that we identify on the list get onto the Open Issues page on the wiki. In that way we can get the legal folk to only review the wiki page and not the whole conversation. I assume

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL License + Outline Procedure

2009-03-01 Thread OJ W
What's the purpose of S5.0 (disclaimer of moral rights), especially since the plain meaning of that section appears to differ from the 'attribution' element of the current license (not that I think attribution is a great idea with so many contributors, but some bulk-data donors include attribution