Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote:
Hello,
I went through Pavel's changesets and I think I've found all the tainted
data. Here is what I did:
1) I went through Pavel's changesets (except the big ones already
identified as ODbL compatible imports).
2) Counted the number of created or modified
There is a list of incompatbile changesets here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Quick_History_Service/Changeset_Lists#Tainted_Changesets
IMHO the best would be for Pavel to accept, but that naturally depends
on him.
Simon
Am 04.04.2012 11:53, schrieb Petr Morávek [Xificurk]:
Petr Morávek
On Mon, Apr 2, 2012 at 7:23 AM, Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT.
There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm:
a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is
okay for those.
b) ODbL compatible -
Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
So lets start by saying that I don't like ODbL and I hate CT.
There are three classes of data I uploaded to osm:
a) Hand created data, most important paths in the woods. CT+ODbL, is
okay for those.
b) ODbL compatible - mass imports. CT+ODbL is okay for
2012/4/2 Petr Morávek [Xificurk] xific...@gmail.com:
Hi,
I admit that I'm pretty confused right now... Are you saying that you've
changed your mind and are willing to agree to ODbL+CT, except for the
changesets containing imports of incompatible data? That would be really
great!
If this is
Pavel Machek wrote:
If this is that case, I personally volunteer to help track down your
changesets containing the incompatible imports.
Thanks!
The only two are the wikipedia imports of places and railway stations,
is this correct?
I think so.
