On 16 November 2011 07:16, Michael Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote:
In the UK, issues due to the use of national mapping agency data have been
resolved and in Australia we have had explicit permission to use the bulk of
government-derived imports. That mostly completes our list of known
Paul Norman penorman@... writes:
I can't agree with that. In some circumstances a node can convey additional
information by virtue of what it is a member of. If a node is a member of
multiple ways it tells you that the ways join. Nodes that are members of
relations are also similar.
Am 17.11.2011 08:37, schrieb Simon Poole:
We (Switzerland and some parts of Germany) have for example started
more or less systematic remapping of anonymous contributions. There is
no real hope that a significant amount of this data will be
re-licensed by the original mappers, and since
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:16:47 +0100, Michael Collinson wrote:
The numbers:
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/treemap.png - each square
represents one user, weighted by size of contribution.
Green=accepted,
Red=Declined or has not responded.
This displays an 800x600 grey image with black
On 16 November 2011 08:07, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 19:16:47 +0100, Michael Collinson wrote:
The numbers:
http://matt.dev.openstreetmap.org/treemap.png - each square
represents one user, weighted by size of contribution. Green=accepted,
Red=Declined or has not
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Labres [mailto:l...@lab.at]
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Database Re-Build
Hello,
there is something wrong with the license status P2 shows...
A node without tags holds only one information: its location (lat+lon).
So for
instance
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Simon Poole wrote:
That said, I believe P2 now has a tool that will completly replace
a node with a new one at the same coordinates which is a bit of
a fix for your specific issue.
Just for clarification - what it
-
Van: Mike Dupont [mailto:jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com]
Verzonden: woensdag 16 november 2011 20:14
Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Database Re-Build
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Simon Poole wrote
in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-OSM-Database-Re-Build-tp6997302p7001734.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo
-OSM-Database-Re-Build-tp6997302p7001734.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
--
James Michael DuPont
Member
On 16.11.11 12:28, Simon Poole wrote:
Currently there is no agreement on what exactly the rules/policy/algorithm
will be to determine which objects or tags will survive the transition
Sorry, but that's the core of the problem: this /has/ to be set first. ASAP.
First we need the rules, then we
(alias: cetest)
Before printing, think about the environment.
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Richard Fairhurst [mailto:rich...@systemed.net]
Verzonden: Wednesday, November 16, 2011 9:22 PM
Aan: legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Database Re-Build
Gert Gremmen
: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Database Re-Build
Gert Gremmen wrote:
Using this O-trick violates the copyright of the previous
owner, just as copying from google would violate their
terms of service.
As they have been for at least three years now, Gert, your opinions about
Potlatch are 100% venting and 0
-Original Message-
From: Michael Collinson [mailto:m...@ayeltd.biz]
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2011 10:17 AM
To: OSM Licensing and other legal discussions.
Subject: [OSM-legal-talk] OSM Database Re-Build
We suggest that re-mapping by individuals is more important initially
than
14 matches
Mail list logo
