Re: [OSM-legal-talk] attributive data enrichment using OSM

2016-07-25 Thread Stefan Jäger
OK, I am afraid that this renders impossible using OSM data for my use case. I appreciate the comments from everybody. Stefan > -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Christoph Hormann [mailto:chris_horm...@gmx.de] > Gesendet: Montag, 25. Juli 2016 09:43 > An: Licensing and other legal

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] attributive data enrichment using OSM

2016-07-25 Thread Stefan Jäger
Thanks you Simon for your views. Unfortunately disclosing any of the data is not an option, because it's clearly not allowed, be it a centroid or the polygon. Actually I was using this discussion list because I want to openly discuss such problems. However, I have the impression it is rather

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] attributive data enrichment using OSM

2016-07-25 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Monday 25 July 2016, Stefan Jäger wrote: > > "Viral aspects" like Martin puts it, sound a bit like a disease :-) The connotation of the term 'viral' has changed quite a bit. Viral marketing for example has - at least for those initiating it - a quite positive appeal. > However, If I

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] attributive data enrichment using OSM

2016-07-25 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 07/25/2016 09:05 AM, Stefan Jäger wrote: > That, in turn, means, any data put together using also OSM data, that is not > publicly accessible, but only in internal networks, can be produced? In the terms of ODbL, "publicly" means (quote) "to Persons other than You or under Your control